Laserfiche WebLink
Location D: Summit CentralArea <br />Area Limits SR 906: Summit Central to Yellowstone Road <br />Jurisdiction WSDOT <br />Summit Central, downhill skiing <br />Speed Limit SR 906:35 mph <br />AADT Not available <br />Proposed Countermeasu res <br />A series of countermeasures were selected for the Summit Central area to <br />address both collision-related and non-collision-related concerns, as illustrated in <br />Figure 29. ltems in bold are FHWA Proven SafetyCountermeasures. <br />Cost Estimates <br />Approximate planning-level costs for each countermeasure are outlined below: <br />Table 6. Location D - Cost Estimates of Proposed Countermeasures <br />Kittitas County I Snoqualmie Pass Comprehensive Safety Plan 54 <br />Collision History <br />Between 2Ot4 and 2023, there were seven reported collisions in and adjacent <br />to this priority area, including two KSI collisions. Of these seven collisions, six <br />collisions involved a vehicle going straight ahead. Two collisions involved a <br />parked vehicle. All were vehicle-only collisions. <br />2 KSt <br />Collisions <br />Olthe 7 collisions: <br />Land Use Context <br />Shared Use Path <br />Roadway Reconfi gu ration <br />Speed Limit Reduction <br />Advance warning <br />signs and/or pavement <br />markings forcrosswalk <br />Pedestrian Hybrid <br />Beacon <br />Crosswalk Lighting <br />2 *o,",or,* <br />lnvolved a <br />parked vehicle. <br />Were <br />vehicle-only <br />collisions. <br />All <br />Corridor <br />Corridor <br />Corridor <br />Corridor <br />Crossing <br />Crossing <br />Not available <br />Not available <br />Not available <br />42% <br />55% <br />40% <br />40% <br />$$$ <br />$$$$$ <br />$ <br />$$ <br />Non-Collision Concerns <br />Additional concerns were identified in this area through public comments, <br />stakeholder feedback, and observation by the County and consultants. <br />Concerns include: <br />6 <br />"orrr"torr"lnvolved a <br />vehicle going <br />straight ahead. <br />. Pedestrians crossing to Summit <br />Central because parking area <br />is separated from Summit <br />Central by SR 906, resulting <br />in frequent crossings of the <br />highway to access the ski area. <br />. Existing crosswalk beacon is <br />not effective because it lacks a <br />pedestrian push button on the <br />west side of the highway and lacks <br />advanced warning for drivers. <br />. Congestion along SR 906 due <br />to conflicts between vehicles <br />parked along roadway and vehicles <br />in travel lane, pedestrians in <br />roadway to access ski area, and <br />a continuous flow of pedestrian <br />crossing causing traffic backups. <br />. High speeds along SR 906 during <br />summer when congestion is <br />reduced and roadways are clear. <br />$$ <br />$$ <br />$$Crosswalk - -- ."9-ro-':irg- <br />Source: SCJ,2025. <br />It is important to note that due to snow-plow activitywithin the Snoqualmie <br />Pass area, recessed plastic pavement markings are recommended for <br />channelization. Sufficient budget must be allocated for renewing pavement <br />markings for the proposed solutions to be effective. <br />" CRFS are approximated based on the data provided bythe FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures. <br />t Costsare based on a preliminaryengineer's estimate of magnitude. <br />29%7 F c:c .-:!",.2'i- Cl:.,:":e'-15 <br />Countermeasure Application Crash reduction factor" Cost levelt