My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Comments_Combined_KimleyHorn
>
Meetings
>
2026
>
05. May
>
2026-05-12 6:00 PM - Planning Commission Public Hearing
>
Comments_Combined_KimleyHorn
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2026 11:40:11 AM
Creation date
5/8/2026 10:15:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
5/12/2026
Meeting title
Planning Commission Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4/21/26, 1:48 PM KHA Mail-Easton Sub Area plan Revisions <br /> Mma i l Kittitas County 2026 Comments <comments@kittitascounty2026.com> <br /> Easton Sub Area plan Revisions <br /> 1 message <br /> Teresa Castrilli <castrcons@gmail.com> Tue,Apr 21, 2026 at 12:35 PM <br /> To: comments@kittitascounty2026.com <br /> Hi Jeremy: <br /> CDS Revisions: <br /> Yes I agree, remove the "one voice"for Easton as CDS suggested based on our Community input. This is not a reality as <br /> stated. <br /> Yes I agree, remove all goal and policy references to specific possible upgrades/additions (e.g. sidewalks, lighting, day <br /> use areas, etc.) <br /> Yes I agree, remove the reference to "Consult with local septic and water experts to understand <br /> development limitations." This is a sticking point and we DO NOT WANT new growth requiring this type of investigation. <br /> Old Town South Easton is historic and as the town grows and is rebuilt it should remain as platted. <br /> Add South Easton Lamird 1 to stay within its current boundaries. This is a very important statement that I want put <br /> in the Easton Subarea plan. I own property adjacent to Lamird 1, 1 received a letter from CDS stating planning was taking <br /> place asking for comment, you (Jeremy) in the meeting stated letters were only sent to those bordering the Lamird. <br /> Therefore, this makes me think you the County want feedback on the Lamird 1 boundary line. KEEP Lamird 1 boundary <br /> lines as they are, we want nothing to do with expanding the boundary lines. This is a stickler for our family and want <br /> this added into the Sub Area plan. I have attended most of these meetings over the last two years just to protect my <br /> property and recreational usage in the Easton area and want this accomplished in the plan. There is plenty of work to be <br /> done just within the historic Lamird 1 boundary lines. No need to be encroaching on people's beloved private family <br /> properties. <br /> Thank you for assisting us with our concerns. <br /> Thank You, <br /> Teresa and Pat Castrilli <br /> https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/?ik=fO8ae6a8l d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=th read-f:1863106211384243382&si mpl=msg-f:1863106211384243382 1/1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.