B - Fully Executed Document - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2. The paragraph of Secfion 2@) labeled o'Review, Ranking and Rccommendrtions by LTAC's" shall be amended to read as follows: Review. Raskjn&and Recommendatio:r$ by LTAC's The County will compile and dishibute ali applications to the municipalities for review by each LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) for riview, ranking, and finding recornmendation, which will then be processed as follows: a. Each municipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) will review every application and assign it a rating based upon an agreed scoring system. b. Eac[ muuicipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) will rank the applications in order by score. c. Eich municipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) will produce a recommended flurdiug level, considering oach application in order of rauk, arrd including any additional comments which provide insight into the respective funding decision. If any apptcations are disqualified, an explanafion shall be provided. d. The ratings, rankings, and reconmendations from eacb LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) wili be submitted to the LTAC Clerk, e. Each municipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if there is no LTAC) must adhere to the agreed- upon grant scoring methodology and meet deadlines for submission. t 1'ne CifeC Clerk will provide at least two weeks' notice, via email, of any deadline(s) to ail municipalities, and each CLTAC member. g. If a municipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if there is no LTAC) does not adhere to the agreed-upoo grant scoring methodology an&or does not meet process deadlines, that mumcipality wi-ll not be allowed to score the applications relevant to that grant cycle and participate in the presentation meeting a:rd voting process. However, that mrmicipality must stitt contriUute fi:nding as described herein, and zuch frurding will be allocated based on the scoring ftom the compliant municipalities' submissions For purposes of this paragraph, as long ai one member from a mumcipality's LTAC (or appohtee(s) if there is no LTAC) adhires to the agreed-upon gratrt scoring methodology and meets process deadlines, that municipality will be allowed to score applications, and panicipate in the presentation meethg and voting process. 3. Section 2(D)(2) shalt tre amended to read as follows: 2) LTAC Work Group Review. The County will compile the ratings, rankings, and recommendations along with the applications and submit them to a combined counfy-wido LTAC work grpup which will be comprised of three members from the LTAC of each participating municipality (or appointees if there is no LTAC) for consideration. The County will act as Chair of the work group, After submission: a. The work group wiil hotd a public meeting where it will provide an opportunity for applicants to make a presentation before the work group and answer any questioas from work group members. b. The work group will review the recommendations, deliberate publicly, and make final recommeadations based upon the master list. All decisions will be made by simple maj ority Page2of11 Page408 of452