Laserfiche WebLink
c' Each municipality,s LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) will produce a <br />recommended ntoai"g level, considering each applicabion in order of rank, <br />and inctuding *y "Iditional <br />comments which provide insight into the <br />rospective fu"dt"g decision. If any applications are disqualified, an <br />explanation shall be Provided. <br />d. The ratings, rankings, and recommendations from each LTAC (or <br />appointeelslif no LTAC) wilt be submitted to the LTAC Clerk' <br />e.Eachmunicipality'sLTAC(orappointee(s)ifthereisnoLTAC)must <br />adhere to the agrela-upon grant scoring methodology and meet deadlines <br />for subrnission. <br />f. The CLTAC Clerk will provide at leasttwo weeks' notice, via email, of any <br />deadtine(s) to all municipalities, and each CLTAC member' <br />g. If a municipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if there is no- LTAC) does not <br />adhere to th- agreed-upon grant scoring methodology and/o1 does not meet <br />process deadliies, tuat municipality will not be allowed to score the <br />applications relevant to that gfant cycle aud participate rn the presentation <br />meeting and voting pro."r-r. Htwever, that municipality must still <br />contribute fitnding a*s described horein, and such finding will be allocated <br />based on the scoring frorn the compliant municipalities' submissions For <br />purposes of this palagraph, as long as one member from a municipality's <br />Lric (or appointee(s) if th"r. is no LTAC) adheres to the agrced-upon <br />grant scoring methodoiogy and meers process deadlines, that municipality <br />will be allowed to score applications, and participate in the presentation <br />meeting and voting Process- <br />2) LTAC Work Group Review. The couaby will compile the ratings, rarkings, and <br />recon'endatior,, ulollfih the appliCations and submit them to a combined <br />cotrnty-wide LTAC *-Jk gronp which will be comprised of three members from <br />the LfAC of each particip-ating municipality (or appointees if ihere is no LTAC) <br />for consideration. The Co,-ty will act as Chair of the work group' After <br />submission: <br />a.Theworkgroupwillholdapublicmeetingwhere.itwillprovidean <br />opportunityforapplicantstomakeapresentationbeforetheworkgroup <br />and uns*"r any questions from work group members' <br />b. The work group will review the recommendations, detiberate publicly, au-d <br />make final recommendations based upon the master list. A1l decisions will <br />bemadebysimplemajorityvote'lntheeventofatievote,theapplication <br />or motion will bie deemed io have been rejected or failed, respectively' <br />c. Msetings of the work group must comply with the -Open Public Meetings <br />Act (c-hapter 42.30 ncw), which iniludes public meeting notice and <br />member quonrm requirements. <br />Page7 of11 <br />Page 413 of 452