B - R2025-242 Fully Executed - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2. The paragraph of Section 2@) labeled "Review, Ranking and Rccommcndltions by LTAC's" shall be amended to read as follows: Review. Rankjng and Recommendatiou$ by LTAC's The County will compile and distribute all applications to tbe munibipalities for review by each LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) for tiui"-, ranking, and firnding recommendation, which will then be processed as follows: a. Each municipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) will review every application and assign it a rating based upon arr agreed scoring system. b. Each municipaiity's LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) will rank the applications in order by soore. c. Each mgnicipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) will produce a recommended funding level, considering oach application in order of rank, and including any additional comments which provide insight into the respective funding decision. If any applicadons are disqualified, an explanafion shall be provided. d. The ratings, rankjngs, andrecommendations from eaoh LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) will be submitted to the LTAC Clerk, e. Each municipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if there is no LTAC) must adhere to the agreed- upon grant scoring methodology and meet deadlines for submission. f 1.ire CL1RC Clerk will provide at least two weeks' notice, via email, of any deadline(s) to all municipalities, and each CLTAC member. g. If a municipality's LTAC (or appoiatee(s) if there is no LTAC) does not adhere to the agreed-upon grant scoring methodology an&or does not meet process deadlines, that municipality wi-ll not be allowed to score the applications relevant to that grant cycle and parficipate in the presentation meeting and votrng process. However, that municipality must stitt contriUute firndilg as described herein, and such frurding will be allocated based on the scoring from the compliant municipalities' submissions For purposes of this paragraph' as loag ui one member from a murucipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if there is no LTAC) adheres to the agreed-upon grant scoring methodology and meets process deadlines, that municipality will be allowed to score applications, and participate in the presentation meeting and voting process. 3. Section 2(D)(2) shalt be amended to read as follows: 2) LTAC Work Group Review. The County will compile the ratings, ranki:rgs, ard recommendations along *ith th* applications and submit them to a combined counfy-wide LTAC work grpup which will be comprised of three members from the LTAC of each participating municipatity (or appointees if there is no LTAC) for consideration. The Couaty will act as Chair of the work group. After submission: a. The *ork gtoup will hold a public meeting where it will provide an opporbunity for applicants to make a presentation before the work group and answer any questions from work group members. b. The work group will review the recommendations, deliberate publicty, and make final recommeodations based upon the master list. All decisions will be made by simple majority Page 2 ot 11 Page 408 of 452