My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4-8-2024_PW SS Briefings (3)
>
Meetings
>
2024
>
04. April
>
2024-04-08 1:30 PM - Public Works Study Session
>
4-8-2024_PW SS Briefings (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2024 2:30:55 AM
Creation date
4/4/2024 3:55:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
4/8/2024
Meeting title
Public Works Study Session
Location
BoCC Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M f . <br /> Of those that did report,few included all required information <br /> We examined 18 published government reports on permit processing time, <br /> and found 10-including two audited governments,Shoreline and Vancouver <br /> -included at least some of the elements required by law.Three of these reports <br /> included only one permit type(such as including only land use permits but <br /> not building or civil permits),even though they included most or all required <br /> statistics.Reports published by four more governments contained most required <br /> elements;however,only one of them included the number of applications <br /> where deadline extensions were used.Finally, Exhibit 11 - Most permit performance reports <br /> four surveyed govermpents said they published lacked some or all required information <br /> performance reports,but what they provided did <br /> no <br /> not meet any of the requirements in state law. Reported most ,�� Reported required daatt <br /> required data a <br /> One of these governments provided a link to its q <br /> report,but we were unable to find the report from <br /> the government's main website.This indicated <br /> it was not publicly accessible,and we therefore <br /> classified it as not meeting the legal requirements. <br /> See Exhibit 11 for a breakdown of performance 0 <br /> reporting results. <br /> Reported some <br /> Overall,the three required elements least likely required data <br /> to be included were the number of permits with <br /> deadline extensions,the number of permits that <br /> Source:Auditor analysis of government report data. <br /> met review deadlines and the number that did not. <br /> Revisions to sto_%c �8_11vLr, iy\fitt chcn nge reporting <br /> requirements si; r-t� �o! �rL �C 5, <br /> Governments that are required to post permit performance reports will soon be <br /> required to adjust the content of their reports.These changes narrow the types of <br /> permits that must be included in the reports. Some formerly reported data will <br /> be eliminated,including the number of permits that did and did not meet review <br /> deadlines and the number of permits where deadline extensions were used.New <br /> required data will include the number of decisions issued for certain types of <br /> permits and the average number of days from submittal to final decision. <br /> The Department of Commerce will play a new role in coordinating the reports <br /> from local governments and publishing the information statewide.Commerce will <br /> be required to develop a report template for all reporting governments to use.This <br /> change offers the agency an opportunity to educate local governments about their <br /> reporting responsibilities.Doing so could help improve reporting by governments <br /> that were unaware of reporting requirements or that believed it did not apply to <br /> them. (See Appendix C for a summary of the changes made under the revised law.) <br /> Growth Management Act Audit Results 1 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.