My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4-8-2024_PW SS Briefings (3)
>
Meetings
>
2024
>
04. April
>
2024-04-08 1:30 PM - Public Works Study Session
>
4-8-2024_PW SS Briefings (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2024 2:30:55 AM
Creation date
4/4/2024 3:55:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
4/8/2024
Meeting title
Public Works Study Session
Location
BoCC Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> Beyond the state law requirements,sharing permit review times with applicants <br /> helps ensure predictability,a key Growth Management Act goal. Governments can <br /> also use this information internally to identify areas where process improvements <br /> may be needed.Therefore,although not a requirement for all governments,this is a <br /> leading practice for all governments. <br /> For this portion of our audit work,we surveyed other local governments that are <br /> required to post these reports,so that we could measure statewide compliance <br /> with this requirement.Our survey population included 45 required governments: <br /> 42 responded,for a 93 percent response rate.For more details on our survey <br /> methodology,see Appendix B. <br /> 1r,N1iC2rLC-1" i re C1f oC,aL C ovC'-r'At`�1( n. �h C:II1r <br /> c}LA' �r�.C-n-LILT. f�ft'i(n, <br /> �1.!' C::C� �C L�1tC}C-1ti -t1C�:Lt L` C�L'1:VCG� � s a <br /> Of the six audited governments,four are required to publish permit performance <br /> reports.Two-Bellingham and Snohomish County-did not publicly post this <br /> information.When asked why they did not do so,staff said other matters had <br /> taken precedence. Officials at Bellingham said that they had published permit <br /> performance metrics under a previous mayor but had stopped for unknown <br /> reasons;the planning director said the city intended to resume publishing this <br /> information but had not yet done so. <br /> Another 29 governments also failed to publish annual permit timeliness reports, <br /> which means only one-third of required local governments did post them. <br /> The surveyed governments that said they did not post permit performance reports <br /> offered three main reasons for not complying with state law: <br /> i <br /> • Most governments mentioned limitations in their IT systems,including <br /> having older systems that lacked the functionality necessary to track the data <br /> or produce the reports,as well as working to develop and implement new <br /> systems. <br /> • Thirteen governments said they had concerns about the quality of the data <br /> they would report. <br /> • Seven governments said they were not aware of the requirement or believed <br /> the requirement did not apply to them. <br /> Growth Management Act - Audit Results 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.