Resolution_LAG Agmt KPFF_NThorpHwyBridge

Home Browse Search

Service Guide to Preparing Biological Assessment (1999), as well as the WSDOT Environmental Manual, WSDOT Advanced Training Manual for BA Preparation. For the purpose of this scopes it is assumed that a No -Effect Letter will meet the needs and requirements of the reviewing agency. This scope assumes that formal consultation with the USFWS and NOAA Fisheries, under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA, will not be necessary. ESA assumes that the project can be designed and constructed to result in a combined "no -effect" determination for all listed species. The project is expected to include a small amount of new impervious surface. In order to demonstrate the project will have "no effect" on listed fish species, ESA will conduct a stormwater analysis using the WSDOT Hi -Run Stormwater Loading and Dilution Model. Assumptions Because the proposed project would not affect salmon bearing waters and can be scheduled to avoid temporary impacts that could adversely affect listed species, it is assumed that ESA compliance will be documented through a "no - effect" letter with appropriate analysis to reach this conclusion. This assumes that both project construction and operation, as well as any mitigation actions, will not result in either direct or indirect effects to listed species. If, based on detailed design information, a no -effect determination cannot be reached and a BA is required for ESA compliance, this scope of work will need to be amended to reflect the greater level of effort for preparing a full BA. The County and WSDOT will each provide one consolidated set of comments for each review draft. Deliverables • One (1) Draft BA for County review in electronic format. • One (1) Draft BA for WSDOT review and comment in electronic format. • One (1) Final BA in electronic format for submission to WSDOT. Task 2.90—Shoreline Environment Review Memorandum The project will be required to comply with the Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program (SMP) for work within 200 feet of waters of the State. The Yakima River shoreline is designated as Rural Conservancy within the project area. However, maintenance activities of existing structures is not considered "development" within the County's SMP (KCMG 17B.01.070(2)). ESA will prepare a memorandum to document the project's compliance with all regulatory requirements for protection of the shoreline environment, including design elements and construction BMPs. Assumptions • It is assumed the project will not require a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit or a Conditional Use Permit. If it is determined a different level of documentation is required for compliance with the County's SMP, a scope and budget amendment by be needed. Deliverables