Resolution_LAG Agmt KPFF_NThorpHwyBridge

Home Browse Search

• One (1) Final CRA in PDF format for County and WSDOT and uploaded to DAHP's WISAARD system. • One (1) Historic Property Inventory Form as an attachment to CRA. Participation in up to three (3) 1 -hour virtual meetings with KPFF 1 County 1 WSDOT 1 DAHP, as needed. Task 2.30 — Critical Areas Report ESA will identify and delineate wetlands and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (FWHCAs) located within 100 feet of the project area, as defined by Kittitas County Code (KCC) 17A. If found, ESA will delineate wetlands, streams, and ditches consistent with County requirements for critical areas assessments (KCC 17A.04), as well as U.S. Corps of Engineers and Washington Department of Ecology wetland delineation standards. Wetland boundaries will be flagged in the field and recorded using a tablet GPS, with data sheets and wetland rating forms completed. ESA will prepare a Critical Areas Report (CAR) consistent with Kittitas County requirements. The report will describe any critical areas found on site or known to occur in the project area and include an initial discussion of regulatory implications if the project will impact or affect such features. Assumptions • The site map depicting critical areas and associated standard buffers, where applicable, will be developed with GPS data collected in the field; or with professional land survey data of flag locations collected by others. Field evaluation of critical areas will be limited to wetlands, streams, and other FWHCAs. • The County will provide one consolidated set of comments for each review draft. Deliverables • One (1) Draft CAR for County review in electronic format. • One (1) Final CAR in electronic format. Task 2.40—Section 4(f) Technical Memorandum Recreation facilities and wildlife and waterfowl refuges will be addressed in a Section 4(f) Technical Memorandum prepared in general accordance with Chapter 457 of the WSDOT Environmental Manual in support of the NEPA documentation. Historic and archeological sites will be studied in the Cultural Resources Assessment (Task 2.20) and referenced in the 4(f) Technical Memorandum. If the impacts to these facilities are identified that constitute a "use" of the property, then a Section 4(f) Evaluation will be appended to the NEPA document. Assumptions It is assumed the project will result in de minimis impacts to Section 4(f) resources. If it is determined the project would result in a constructive use of Section 4(f) resources, additional analysis would be required and this scope and budget would be amended.