My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-11-26-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2018-11-26-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 2:10:25 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 2:09:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/4/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
49668
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kittitas County Flood Control Zone District Advisory Board Questionnaire <br />6. We will need to prioritize flood projects in each commissioner district. Have <br />you worked in a team environment in the past? If so, please elaborate. <br />I regularly represent my employer on various work groups, committees, etc. <br />to balance multiple priorities and interests. These efforts typically involve a <br />combination of technical, regulatory, political, and funding issues and nearly <br />always involve compromises by multiple parties. A substantial part of this <br />work recently is comprised of my involvement in the Yakima Basin <br />Integrated Plan (YBIP), where I serve on the Water Use, Habitat, and Lower <br />River subcommittees and serve as an alternate on the Workgroup and <br />Executive committee. <br />Earlier in my career, I led a team of six environmental professionals within <br />Snohomish County Public works, regularly working with leads of other <br />groups (e.g. Engineering, Construction, Right -of -Way, Surface Water <br />Management) to ensure that we were effectively working across disciplines <br />to serve the interests of the county. <br />7. Can you be fair and unbiased when it comes to selecting projects? <br />Yes. An important precursor to demonstrating fairness will be establishing <br />clear and transparent criteria for selecting projects and vetting those criteria <br />appropriately. In that way, we will be able to ensure that we are selecting <br />projects that fit the FCZD's priorities and we can be held accountable when <br />projects are selected. <br />As an example, in 2012, I worked as part of a four person team to rewrite the <br />scoring criteria for the YBFWRB Technical Advisory Group to review and <br />evaluate funding proposals. The effort was necessary in light of concerns <br />regarding inconsistent and biased project reviews. Through our work, we <br />were able to increase scoring consistency, increase transparency and reduce <br />the perception of hidden biases that some project advocates held. <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.