|
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4
<br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences
<br />PAGE 4-232
<br />Table 4.9-4 Summary of Impacts on Employment, Income, Value Added, and Output Using
<br />Implan
<br />CATEGORY EMPLOYMENT LABOR INCOME TOTAL VALUE ADDED OUTPUT
<br />Project Alone
<br />Alternatives A-H 41.0 $4,013,778 $15,648,941 $28,648,283
<br />NNR Alternative 23.7 $2,881,302 $8,874,410 $17,276,424
<br />NNR Alternative - MR Subroute 30.2 $3,300,667 $10,166,054 $19,780,301
<br />Ripple Effects
<br />Direct Effect (suppliers)
<br />Alternatives A-H 34.8 $1,004,928 $1,743,835 $3,036,853
<br />NNR Alternative 24.0 $711,967 $1,233,984 $2,187,328
<br />NNR Alternative - MR Subroute 26.6 $793,135 $1,372,718 $2,434,541
<br />Indirect Effect (supply chain)
<br />Alternatives A-H 4.8 $203,186 $310,435 $569,514
<br />NNR Alternative 3.2 $142,559 $217,396 $406,740
<br />NNR Alternative - MR Subroute 3.6 $158,797 $242,242 $452,604
<br />Induced Effect (re-spending of household income)
<br />Alternatives A-H 7.5 $271,813 $475,723 $791,508
<br />NNR Alternative 5.2 $201,116 $351,862 $579,080
<br />NNR Alternative - MR Subroute 5.9 $225,723 $394,916 $649,933
<br />Total Ripple Effects
<br />Alternatives A-H 47.1 $1,479,927 $2,529,993 $4,397,875
<br />NNR Alternative 32.5 $1,055,641 $1,803,242 $3,173,148
<br />NNR Alternative - MR Subroute 36.1 $1,177,655 $2,009,877 $3,537,077
<br />Total Impact
<br />Alternatives A-H 88.1 $5,493,705 $18,178,934 $33,046,158
<br />NNR Alternative 58.9 $3,936,943 $10,884,287 $20,449,572
<br />NNR Alternative - MR Subroute 66.3 $4,478,322 $12,175,931 $23,317,378
<br />Impact Multiplier
<br />Alternatives A-H 2.15 1.37 1.16 1.15
<br />NNR Alternative 2.23 1.37 1.23 1.18
<br />NNR Alternative - MR Subroute 2.20 1.36 1.20 1.18
<br />Income
<br />The impacts of the Project on labor income would be lower compared to the original labor income
<br />derived from construction than the impacts on employment. This is due primarily to (1) the lower average
<br />wage in affected industries described in the previous section and (2) to the Project's purchases of labor
<br />and materials largely from outside the Study Region (i.e., approximately 10 percent of labor and materials
<br />expenditures would be injected into the local economy). Labor income would increase for all Action
<br />Alternatives (Table 4.9-5).
<br />Impacts on labor income would be similar compared to the labor income of the Study Region than
<br />impacts on employment. Compared to total personal income of about $13.8 billion in the Study Region in
<br />2013, the total impact of the proposed Project of $3.9 million to $5.5 million would be 0.03 and 0.04
<br />percent for the NNR Alternative and Alternatives A-H, respectively.
|