Laserfiche WebLink
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> <br /> PAGE 4-112 <br />slopes are probably heavily used during winter. This area overlaps the route segment ROW corridor for <br />1.6 miles. Potential impacts include habitat loss, habitat degradation from the spread of invasive weeds, <br />collision with vehicles during construction and maintenance, and disturbance during construction and <br />maintenance. Mule deer are most likely to be impacted by disturbance during winter when increased <br />energy expenditure may lower survival and during parturition when fawns are relatively immobile and <br />vulnerable. Adherence to seasonal restrictions from December 1 to March 1 on construction activities <br />within the designated concentration area should minimize disturbance impacts to mule deer. Impact levels <br />to mule deer are anticipated to be moderate for the 1.6 miles of the route segment that overlap the <br />designated concentration area. <br />All habitat disturbance associated with Route Segment NNR-6o/NNR-6u would be located within the <br />Regularly Occupied Habitat MU for Sage-Grouse. For either option construction activities would disturb <br />less than1 percent of Regularly Occupied Habitat (Table 4.3-7). <br />For Route Segment NNR-6o, anticipated disturbance includes 26.5 acres of suitable Sage-Grouse habitat <br />and 4.1 acres of marginal habitat. Undergrounding Route Segment NNR-6u would increase the <br />anticipated disturbance to 50.1 acres of suitable habitat and 7.3 acres of marginal habitat (Table 4.3-8). <br />With the implementation of RDFs (Sections 4.3.3.1 and 4.3.3.2), habitat impact levels would be low for <br />2.3 miles and moderate for 4.1 miles. <br />Existing perching, roosting and nesting sites for avian predators are available along Route Segment NNR- <br />6/NNR-6u from buildings, trees, and fences associated with developed areas and existing distribution and <br />230 kV H-frame transmission lines. Construction of Route Segment NNR-6o would require an estimated <br />48 new structures, all of which would be located within 0.25 mile of an existing transmission line (Table <br />4.3-5). Although the underground option would not require transmission towers, at both transitions <br />between above-ground and underground transmission, a transition station would be required, resulting in <br />approximately five acres of disturbance at each transition station. <br />The estimated Sage-Grouse population range does not overlap the Route Segment NNR-6/NNR-6u ROW <br />(Figure 3.3-4). Approximately 3.7 miles of Route Segment NNR-6/NNR-6U is within 4.0 miles of an <br />active lek (Table 4.3-6). All new structures within 4.0 miles of the active lek would be visually obstructed <br />by terrain and therefore not visible from the lek. The lek is described in Section 4.3.3.3 Sage-Grouse. <br />With the implementation of RDFs (Sections 4.3.3.1 and 4.3.3.2), lek impact levels are anticipated to be <br />low for 2.7 miles and moderate for 3.7 miles. <br />4.3.4.16 Route Segment NNR-7 <br />All disturbance (38.1 acres) would occur within areas classified as sagebrush/perennial grassland; <br />therefore, it was all considered long-term impact because sagebrush would recover very slowly following <br />disturbance (Table 4.3-4). In 2014, a 23,261-acre fire burned the majority of Route Segment NNR-7. <br />Because perennial bunchgrasses typically recover quickly after a fire and sagebrush typically recovers <br />much more slowly. Currently much of the route segment is probably perennial grassland rather than <br />shrubland—though depending on burn severity, over the next several years to several decades the <br />sagebrush cover will likely return. RDFs would be implemented to minimize habitat loss and degradation, <br />as described in Section 4.3.3.1. Impact levels to special status species habitat are expected to be low for <br />7.1 miles and moderate for 1.1 miles. <br />The presence of new transmission structures, which could provide additional perch and/or nesting sites <br />for avian predators, could negatively impact nearby prey species such as small mammals and avian <br />species, particularly when the new structures are built in an area where perching opportunities currently <br />do not exist (i.e., greater than 0.25 mile from existing structures or trees). Construction of Route Segment