My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
>
Meetings
>
2018
>
12. December
>
2018-12-18 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Vantage to Pomona FEIS Index 34
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 1:49:29 PM
Creation date
12/13/2018 1:34:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
12/18/2018
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Conduct a Closed Record Meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the Vantage to Pomona Transmission Line Conditional Use Permit (CU-18-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
50108
Type
Conduct closed record hearing
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
980
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> <br /> PAGE 4-94 <br />designated concentration area, no identifiable impacts are anticipated to occur to mule deer through <br />construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed Project. <br />Route Segment 2d passes through the Rattlesnake Elk Winter Range Regular Concentration Area for 6.2 <br />miles of the seven-mile route segment. RDFs to minimize impacts to elk will include a seasonal <br />restriction on construction. Specifically, construction would be avoided during the wintering season, <br />typically December 1 through March 1, or as defined by WDFW for each big game population in question <br />(Section 2.3). The avoidance RDF is anticipated to be effective at minimizing impacts to elk; therefore, <br />impacts are expected to be low for the 6.2 miles of the route segment that are within designated winter <br />range. <br />As Route Segment 2d descends the slopes near the Columbia River, it passes near and over steep bluffs <br />and bands of cliffs, which provide nesting substrates for raptors. Several nests of prairie falcons have been <br />documented within one mile of the route segment—the closest of which is approximately 0.4 mile away. <br />Prairie falcon is not a special status species, but it is sensitive to nest disturbance and indicates suitable <br />nesting cliffs that could provide nesting substrates for other raptor species. Further south, on the south- <br />facing slopes between Cold Creek and the Columbia River, a ferruginous hawk nesting territory with <br />three documented nests was recorded in 2010. Two of the three nests are within a half mile of the route <br />segment with the nearest located approximately 0.25 from the route segment. Potential impacts to raptors <br />would occur from biological disturbance during construction activities or from injury or mortality from <br />vehicle strikes or interactions with other equipment used during construction. Noise from construction <br />equipment and general construction activities could disturb and displace individuals during the sensitive <br />nesting period. RDFs to minimize impact on raptors are described in Sections 4.3.3.1 and 4.3.3.2. RDFs <br />include the stipulation that, within the breeding season, construction would be avoided within species- <br />specific raptor nest buffers to avoid disturbing nesting birds (0.5 mile for ferruginous hawk and 0.25 mile <br />for prairie falcon; see RDFs in Chapter 2). Following implementation of RDFs, impact levels on prairie <br />falcons are expected to be moderate for 2.8 miles. <br />All habitat disturbance associated with Route Segment 2d would be located within the Regularly <br />Occupied Habitat MU for Sage-Grouse. Construction activities would disturb less than one percent of <br />Regularly Occupied Habitat (Table 4.3-7). Anticipated ground disturbance includes 34.1 acres of suitable <br />Sage-Grouse habitat and 7.8 acres of marginal habitat (Table 4.3-8). With the implementation of RDFs <br />(Sections 4.3.3.1 and 4.3.3.2), the scale of disturbance and degradation to Sage-Grouse habitat is <br />anticipated to be low for 1.3 miles and moderate for 5.7 miles. <br />The Range 12 Fire of 2016 burned approximately 4.5 miles along Route Segment 2d. As previously <br />stated, post-fire restoration efforts for the Range 12 fire are in development and impacts to wildlife habitat <br />have not been fully assessed following the fire. <br />Construction of Route Segment 2d would require an estimated 50 new structures, all of which would be <br />located greater than 0.25 mile of an existing transmission line (Table 4.3-5). <br />Fourteen percent of the Route Segment 2d ROW is within the estimated Sage-Grouse population range, <br />but none of the route segment’s ROW is within the core population range (Figure 3.3-4). No active or <br />inactive leks are known to occur within four miles of Route Segment 2d (Table 4.3-6). Impacts to lekking <br />Sage-Grouse associated with the construction of Route Segment 2d are anticipated to be low for the entire <br />7.0-mile length of the route segment. <br />4.3.4.8 Route Segment 3a <br />The entirety of anticipated ground disturbance for this short route segment is anticipated to occur in <br />sagebrush/perennial grassland (1.2 acres) and, thus, is considered a long-term impact. RDFs would be
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.