Laserfiche WebLink
Vantage to Pomona Heights Chapter 4 <br />230 kV Transmission Line Project FEIS Environmental Consequences <br /> <br /> PAGE 4-93 <br />anticipated to be effective at minimizing impacts. Following implementation of RDFs, no identifiable <br />impacts are anticipated from Route Segment 2d. <br />Critical habitats for bull trout, the Columbia River Chinook salmon ESU, and the Upper Columbia River <br />steelhead DPS occur within 1.0 mile of Route Segment 2d in the Columbia River. Tributaries of the <br />Columbia River in and near the Project area are not part of the Upper Columbia River Spring Run <br />Chinook salmon ESU; they are part of the Mid-Columbia River Spring Run Chinook salmon ESU which <br />is not listed under the ESA (NOAA 2013). Aside from the Columbia River, it is unlikely that spawning <br />occurs in streams within the Project area. Bull trout and Chinook salmon are not known to spawn within <br />streams within the Project area because the streams are too small and not cold enough over a long enough <br />time period to provide suitable spawning and rearing habitat; however, bull trout could use streams for <br />short periods for foraging (AECOM Environmental 2010). No structure or road construction work would <br />occur directly within the Columbia River. Erosion would be minimized by applying and maintaining <br />standard erosion and sediment control methods. The implementation of RDFs is anticipated to be <br />effective at minimizing impacts to all three species. No identifiable impacts to the three species or their <br />habitats are anticipated to occur through construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed <br />Project. <br />Breeding loggerhead shrikes were observed within a half mile of Route Segment 2d in 1993. Potential <br />impacts to shrikes include direct habitat loss, indirect habitat loss or degradation, increased predation <br />from corvids and raptors attracted to nesting and/or perching opportunities on the new transmission line <br />structures, and disturbance or displacement from noise or visual disturbance, especially during <br />construction. RDFs would be implemented to minimize impacts, as described in Sections 4.3.3.1 and <br />4.3.3.2. Impact levels to loggerhead shrike are estimated to be moderate for 2.0 miles of the route <br />segment. <br />White-tailed jackrabbit has been documented within a half mile of Route Segment 2d. Potential impacts <br />include a reduction and degradation of habitat, disturbance and displacement from habitats, increased <br />predation from avian predators, increased human activity, introduction and spread of noxious weeds, and <br />injury or mortality due to collision with construction equipment. RDFs to address the impacts are <br />described in Sections 4.3.3.1 and 4.3.3.2. Impact levels to black-tailed jackrabbits are expected to be <br />moderate for 2.0 miles and low for 5.0 miles. <br />Route Segment 2d crosses 0.9 miles of chukar Priority Species Regional Area. Potential impacts include <br />disturbance or displacement, injury or mortality from vehicle strikes and equipment, and direct habitat <br />loss or degradation. Noise from construction equipment, helicopters, and general construction activities <br />could disturb and displace chukar on a short-term basis. In addition, the transmission line structures <br />would serve as perch sites for raptor species, which could prey on chukar. The implementation of RDFs, <br />as described in Sections 4.3.3.1 and 4.3.3.2, is anticipated to reduce impacts to chukar. Impact levels to <br />chukar are anticipated to be moderate for the 0.9 mile of the route segment that cross the chukar <br />concentration area. <br />Much of the area along the southwest side of the Columbia River has been identified as a mule deer <br />regular large concentration area. This area comes within approximately 0.1 mile of Route Segment 2d for <br />a short stretch of the Project area. Potential impacts to mule deer include habitat loss, habitat degradation <br />from the spread of invasive weeds, collision with vehicles during construction and maintenance and <br />disturbance during construction and maintenance. Mule deer are most likely to be impacted by <br />disturbance during winter when increased energy expenditure may lower survival. Adherence to seasonal <br />restrictions from December 1 to March 1 on construction activities within the designated concentration <br />area should minimize disturbance impacts to mule deer. Because Route Segment 2d does not cross the