Grant - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Appendix A: Brief Narrative Problemsllnconsistencies: STAFFING: From the time this grant project was selected till even now we have run into many obstacles, and inconsistencies given between grant administration staff and leadership. Work inhibiting obstacles were March 1-August 31 restriction of migratory birds, and March 31 -July 31 restriction for Northern Spotted Owl nesting and roosting habitat, and Industrial Fire Protection Levels for the summer season. In the grant period, the realistic work time frame for four of the project boundaries are fall only. Since the grant was active, that has been equal to about six months at most. In combination with the work restrictions and obstacles, FEMAlWashington State Department of Emergency Management Division (WA EMD) and local agency turnover has impacted this project. Kittitas County Conservation District (KCCD) has had two project contacts from WA EMD, Brynne Walker and Courtney Merwin (she will be leaving at the end of March 2018). The frustration from having issues worked out with the previous contact, and then to have the same questions/processes revisited, adjusted or repeated. Local county turnover has occurred as well, Brenda Larsen, Kittitas Fire Marshal, left in April 2015 (who was the original applicant for the grant), Deputy Fire Marshal Josh Hink left in March 2018, and Suzanne Wade, KCCD Wildfire Mitigation Fuels Reduction Project Manager left in July 2016. Since that time , Rose Shriner has replaced Suzanne Wade as KCCD staff, and there has been no replacement or re-hiring in the Kittitas County Fire Marshal's office. KCCD has also had the financial manager, Sarah Leist leave in January 2016, and was replaced by Miranda Nash at that time. Miranda Nash has been providing financial support the remainder of the grant project period. TIMELINE/ALLOWABLE WORK PERIOD: Per section q of the approved Scope of Work, if work had to be done during March 1-August 31 st, a qualified bird professional was sent to monitor pre-conditions and post conditions. Contractors were notified if site conditions required site specific prescriptions by meeting the contractor prior to work implementation on the project site. Please see Appendix D of for Migratory Bird Breeding Survey reports conducted during this grant period. On the ground implementation was followed by Attachment B Scope of Work, and buffers were kept from OHWM. No work took place in the OHWM. Along the same lines of the allowable work period, the confusion in the beginning of the grant (related to migratory bird requirements among others), did not adequately allow for efficient project implementation planning, since it took till mid 2015 to start implementing projects. An extension was asked and approved in December 2016, to allow adequate time till January 9, 2018, which helped the remainder five cost-share contracts be completed.