My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 5 52 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit A | March 2016 | Page 52 of 339 <br />to assess the degree and extent of potential impacts to shoreline functions. When <br />reviewing proposals for new shoreline use and development, the Administrator shall <br />first determine whether identified shoreline impacts have been avoided and secondly <br />minimized. The Administrator shall require compensatory mitigation, designed by a <br />qualified professional, for development proposals that: <br />a. Do not fully conform to one (1) or more of the dimensional requirements, <br />performance standards, and/or design criteria in this Program; or <br />b. Require a variance or conditional use permit; or <br />c. Result in measureable damage, loss and/or displacement of a wetland, aquatic <br />habitat conservation area, wildlife habitat conservation area, flood storage or <br />conveyance area, or critical aquifer recharge area. <br />4. Land divisions: When new lots are created within shoreline jurisdiction they shall <br />meet all of the following conditions: <br />a. All lots shall contain sufficient area outside of the shoreline buffer (see Table <br />5.5-1), wetland and/or wetland buffer, aquatic habitat conservation area <br />and/or aquatic habitat conservation area buffer, floodway, channel migration <br />zone or landslide hazard area and/or landslide hazard area buffer to <br />accommodate the use and/or development. Land divisions for non-water- <br />dependent and non-water-related developments that create more than four <br />(4) new lots shall adhere to the standard shoreline buffer requirements shown <br />in Table 5.5-1 without buffer averaging or reduction. Buffers that have been <br />averaged or reduced by any prior actions administered by Kittitas County <br />shall not be further averaged or reduced. <br />b. A new lot or parcel may be created in a seismic hazard area as long as there <br />is a note on the face of the plat or other recorded document which indicates <br />the presence of a potential hazard. <br />c. Open space or conservation area lots may be established without a site that <br />is suitable for use and/or development provided there is a note on the face of <br />the plat or other recorded document which indicates the purpose of the lot. <br /> <br />5. Compensatory mitigation measures shall occur in the vicinity of the impact or at an <br />alternative location within the same watershed that provides greater and more <br />sustainable ecological benefits. When determining whether offsite mitigation <br />provides greater and more sustainable benefits, the Administrator shall consider <br />limiting factors, critical habitat needs, and other factors identified by the April 2014 <br />Shoreline Restoration Plan, or an approved watershed or comprehensive resource <br />management plan. The Administrator may also approve use of alternative mitigation <br />practices such as in-lieu fee programs, mitigation banks, and other similar <br />approaches when they meet the requirements of 5.2.D.4. <br />6. The Administrator shall prohibit any shoreline use or development that will result in <br />unmitigated cumulative impacts.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.