My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
>
Meetings
>
2016
>
03. March
>
2016-03-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
BOCC Exhibits A-E ECY Approved SMP-Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2018 10:36:59 AM
Creation date
4/7/2018 10:31:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/15/2016
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
m
Item
Request to Approve an Ordinance with Amendments to the Kittitas County Code and Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan to reflect the Washington State Department of Ecology Approved Shoreline Master Program for Kittitas County
Order
13
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
28372
Type
Ordinance
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program <br />Chapter 5 53 <br />March 7, 2016 <br />Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners Shoreline Master Program Adopting Ordinance <br />Kittitas County Shoreline Master Program Exhibit A | March 2016 | Page 53 of 339 <br />7. When compensatory mitigation plans for impacts to shoreline resources are <br />required, all of the following shall apply: <br />a. The quality and quantity of the replaced, enhanced, or substituted resources <br />shall be the same or better than the affected resources; <br />b. The mitigation site and associated vegetative planting shall be nurtured and <br />maintained such that healthy native plant communities grow and mature over <br />time; <br />c. The mitigation shall be informed by pertinent scientific and technical studies, <br />including, but not limited to, the May 2013 Shoreline Inventory and <br />Characterization Report (ICR), the April 2014 Shoreline Restoration Plan, and <br />other background studies prepared in support of this Program; <br />d. The mitigation shall replace the functions as quickly as possible following the <br />impacts; <br />e. Mitigation activity shall be monitored and maintained to ensure that it achieves its <br />intended functions and values; <br />f. The Administrator shall require the applicant/proponent to post a bond or provide <br />other financial surety equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the estimated <br />cost of the mitigation to ensure the mitigation is carried out successfully. The <br />bond/surety shall be refunded to the applicant/proponent upon completion of the <br />mitigation activity and any required monitoring; and <br />g. Compensatory mitigation plans shall be prepared by qualified professionals with <br />education, training and experience in the applicable field. <br /> <br />8. The County shall have the authority to require the applicant/proponent to submit <br />special studies, assessment, and analyses as necessary to identify and address <br />impacts including, but not limited to, impacts on fish and wildlife habitat, public <br />access/use, aesthetics, flood and floodplain impacts and other shoreline attributes. <br />9. Cumulative effects <br />a. In review of applications for shoreline permits and exemptions, the County shall <br />consider the cumulative impacts of individual uses and developments, including <br />preferred uses and uses that are exempt from permit requirements, when <br />determining whether a proposed use or development could cause a net loss of <br />ecological functions. The geographic scope of the analysis shall include the <br />shoreline water body potentially affected by the proposal within the bounds of the <br />County’s geographic authority, unless the Shoreline Administrator determines <br />that a larger or smaller area of analysis is appropriate. <br />b. The County shall have the authority to require the applicant/proponent to prepare <br />special studies, assessments and analyses as necessary to identify and address <br />cumulative impacts including, but not limited to, impacts on fish and wildlife <br />habitat, public access/use, aesthetics, flood and floodplain impacts and other <br />shoreline attributes. <br />c. Proponents of shoreline use and development shall take the following factors into <br />account when assessing cumulative impacts:
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.