Laserfiche WebLink
PROPOSAL DETAILS Eligible Points Reviewer’s <br />Score <br />5. Gaps and Duplication in Services <br /> <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Did the applicant describe how the project fills a gap in services? <br /> Did the applicant describe how the project isn’t a duplication of <br />services? <br /> <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? Was the answer clear? <br /> Does the project fill a gap (or more than one) in the community? <br /> Is there a duplication of services present? <br /> <br />5 <br />6. Sustainability <br /> <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Did the applicant describe their ability, experience, and resources to <br />implement and sustain the project? <br /> <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? Was the answer clear? <br /> Does the applicant have experience sustaining projects for the <br />expected duration? <br /> Do they have adequate resources for sustainability? <br /> What would happen if county funding for the project were no <br />longer an option? <br /> <br /> <br />5 <br />7. Goals and Objectives <br /> <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Were the tables filled out completely and adequately? <br /> <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well were the tables filled out? <br /> Is it clear what the project’s goals, measures, objectives, and <br />strategies are? <br /> Do the goals clearly align with the project description and the <br />county priorities? <br /> Are the measures and the objectives measurable? <br /> <br />15 <br />TOTALS 65 <br /> <br />