My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017 RFP scoring matrix
>
Meetings
>
2017
>
02. February
>
2017-02-21 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2017 RFP scoring matrix
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2018 2:42:15 PM
Creation date
1/16/2018 11:39:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
2/21/2017
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
b
Item
Request to Approve the Homelessness & Affordable Housing Grant Application Form
Order
2
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
34993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
BUDGET NARRATIVE Eligible Points Reviewer’s <br />Score <br />1. Funding Utilization <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Is there a detailed description of how funds will be used for the <br />project? How will they spend the funds? <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? <br /> Is it clear how the funds will be spent to support the proposed <br />project? <br /> Is the proposed use of funds appropriate for the project? <br />5 <br />2. Other Support <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Is there a description of other types of support for the project? <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? <br /> Is it clear how other types of support will be used for the project? <br /> What is the degree of other support? <br /> Are county funds the only resource for the project? <br /> Are there guaranteed or uncertain forms of support, or both? <br />5 <br />3. Sustainability <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Is there a description of how the project would or wouldn’t be <br />sustained if the county funds were not available? <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? <br /> Is it clear how the funds affect the sustainability of the project? <br /> Can the project be sustained either fully or partially without county <br />funds in the future? <br /> Are there any plans for future sustainability without county funds? <br />5 <br />4. Partial Funding <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Is there a description of how the project would be impacted if only <br />partial funds were awarded? <br /> Is there a description of how the proposal could be adjusted for <br />partial funds? <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? <br /> Is it clear how partial funding would impact the project? <br /> Is the project scalable to the amount of funds received? Or is it “all <br />or nothing”? <br />5 <br />TOTALS 20 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.