My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017 RFP scoring matrix
>
Meetings
>
2017
>
02. February
>
2017-02-21 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2017 RFP scoring matrix
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2018 2:42:15 PM
Creation date
1/16/2018 11:39:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
2/21/2017
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
b
Item
Request to Approve the Homelessness & Affordable Housing Grant Application Form
Order
2
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
34993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
PROPOSAL DETAILS Eligible Points Reviewer’s <br />Score <br />2. Project Description Summary <br /> <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Summary of proposed project <br /> Description of how it will address homelessness and/or affordable <br />housing <br /> If the proposal is to provide direct client services; or maintenance, <br />construction, or improvement of housing <br /> <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? <br /> Is it clear what the organization is proposing to do? <br /> How well will this project address homelessness and/or affordable <br />housing? <br /> What kind of an impact will it have on Kittitas County? <br /> Are there any potential unintended consequences of this project? <br /> <br />15 <br />3. County Priorities <br /> <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Did the applicant indicate which county priorities are being <br />addressed? <br /> Is there a description of how the priorities are being addressed? <br /> <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? <br /> Is there a clear connection between the proposed project and the <br />county priorities? <br /> How many priorities are addressed in the proposal? <br /> <br />15 <br />4. Partnerships <br /> <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Did the applicant list key partnerships for the project? <br /> Are the partners’ roles described? <br /> <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? <br /> Is it clear how community partnerships are a part of the project? <br /> How many partnerships are listed? <br /> What kind of roles do they have in the project? <br /> Are there any key partners missing? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.