HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-04-26-minutes-hr-study-sessionCOMMISSIONERS’ MINUTES
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
BOCC AUDITORIUM
SPECIAL MEETING
HR STUDY SESSION
THURSDAY 9:00 AM APRIL 26, 2018
Board members present: Laura Osiadacz, Obie O’Brien, Paul Jewell
Others: Barb Demory, Lisa Young, Jeanne Killgore
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 9:01 AM.
2. TRANSLATOR STIPEND DISCUSSION/DECISION – DISTRICT COURT
HR Director Young briefly reviewed the District Court’s proposal of a monthly stipend for staff that have
been qualified by the Judge to serve as a court translator. This is a continuation of the discussion from
two previous HR Study Sessions. Court Administrator Demory was present to answer questions and
provide any additional information needed. The proposal would require an MOU with Union 792 CH.
Commissioner Jewell and Commissioner Osiadacz expressed concerns about opening up the union
contract mid-cycle, and questioned the implications it may have with other employee groups and/or
departments around the County. Commissioner Jewell suggested that the proposal be rewritten to be
specific to the circumstances of the court and to leave no room for outside interpretation.
Commissioner Osiadacz and Commissioner O’Brien agreed with Commissioner Jewell’s suggestion.
Director Young will work with Commissioner Jewell on a draft MOU in preparation for future discussion.
3. STAFFING DISCUSSION/DECISION – TREASURER’S OFFICE/DEPUTY TREASURER
The Commissioners discussed the Treasurer’s plan to add a Deputy Treasurer position to his staff. The
Commissioners noted that the Treasurer must have the necessary documents signed prior to moving
forward with the position as these documents create funding for the position. Director Young noted
that part of the future discussion will include staffing changes due an upcoming vacancy in the
Treasurer’s Office. The Treasurer was not present for this discussion so further discussion will be held
for the next HR Study Session.
4. CONSIDER FOR APPROVAL A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ELECTED OFFICIAL WAGES
Director Young presented a Resolution for signature that would adopt Elected Official wages for 2019-
2022. The Resolution was created based on the compensation strategy recommended by the Citizens’
Advisory Committee on Salaries for Elected Officials, and the implementation plan discussed at the
COMMISSIONERS’ MINUTES
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
BOCC AUDITORIUM
SPECIAL MEETING
HR STUDY SESSION
previous HR Study Session. Commissioner O’Brien moved to approve Resolution 2018-068.
Commissioner Jewell seconded the motion. Motion approved; 3:0.
5. REQUEST TO APPROVE CHAIR SIGNATURE ON THE KVH WORKPLACE HEALTH – SERVICES AND
CONTRACT PRICING AGREEMENT
Director Young presented a price agreement from KVH Workplace Health that would allow us to use
their facility for required CDL physicals. Director Young noted that the price agreement does not bind us
to strictly using KVH for this purpose; however, she hopes that the Union will agree to name KVH
Workplace Health the primary facility for CDL physicals which would save time and money for the
employees and County. Commissioner O’Brien moved to approve Chair signature on the pricing
agreement. Commissioner Jewell seconded the motion. Motion approved; 3:0.
6. CONSIDER FOR APPROVAL THE EXECUTION OF THE CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION OF GREATER
COLUMBIA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LLC
Commissioner O’Brien commented that this is the document needed to initiate the LLC, and it is the
same as the draft previously shared but with signature pages. Commissioner Jewell moved to approve
Board signature on the Certificate. Commissioner O’Brien seconded the motion. Motion approved; 3:0.
7. REQUEST FROM THE PINK E-RACERS TO HOLD THE ANNUAL PIZZA PINK OUT ON MAY 30TH
Director Young presented the request from the Pink E-Racers to use the BOCC Auditorium on May 30th,
2018 for the purpose of serving pizza to County staff as part of their annual fundraiser for the Susan G.
Komen Race for the Cure. Commissioner O’Brien moved to approve the request. Commissioner
Osiadacz seconded the motion. Motion approved; 3:0.
8. OTHER BUSINESS
Executive Session – Performance of a Public Employee
RCW 42.30.110 (g) To evaluate the qualifications of an applicant for public employment or to review the performance of a public
employee. However, subject to RCW 42.30.140(4), discussion by a governing body of salaries, wages, and other conditions of
employment to be generally applied within the agency shall occur in a meeting open to the public, and when a governing body
elects to take final action hiring, setting the salary of an individual employee or class of employees, or discharging or disciplining
an employee, that action shall be taken in a meeting open to the public.
COMMISSIONERS’ MINUTES
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
BOCC AUDITORIUM
SPECIAL MEETING
HR STUDY SESSION
The Commission entered executive session at 9:49 AM to discuss the performance of a public employee.
Anticipated length: 5 minutes; anticipated action: none. The Commission exited executive session at
9:54 AM with no action taken.
10. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 9:54 AM.
KITTITAS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTITAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Lisa Young, HR Director Laura Osiadacz, Chairman
COURT TRANSLATOR PAY – OPTIONS TO CONSIDER
STIPEND or PREMIUM PAY
The District Court is proposing three levels of Court Translator pay based on level of qualification.
I. Qualified by the Judge - $150/month ($.865/hour)
II. Registered with a State Agency (i.e., DSHS Social Service Interpreter) - $250/month ($1.442/hour)
III. State Certified Interpreter - $350/month ($2.019/hour)
According to a 2017 survey conducted by the Court Interpreter Program, the average hourly rate for each of
these categories is:
I. $46 (*173.333=$7973/mo.)
II. $50 ($8667/mo.)
III. $54 ($9360/mo.)
Hours were tracked by one Court staff member for the months of May and June (2017), and reported as:
May 2017 – 4.33 hours (260 minutes) – approximately 3% of full time
June 2017 – 4.17 hours (250 minutes) – approximately 2% of full time
There are different ways to calculate additional pay via stipend or premium pay.
1) Monthly Stipend – as proposed by the Court, employees may qualify for a monthly stipend. Per the
proposal above, an employee qualified by the Judge to provide translator services would receive
$150/month. For illustrative purposes, based on the hours spent providing translator services for
the months of May and June, this would equate to $34.64/hour and $35.97/hour, respectively. For
an employee registered with a State Agency (such as DSHS), this would equate to $57.74 and $59.95
per hour, respectively. This is in addition to their regular rate of pay. (Payroll would prefer that the
monthly amount be converted to an hourly rate of pay for administrative purposes).
2) Hourly Premium Pay - $150 converted to an hourly rate is $.865; $250 = $1.442, and $350 = $2.019.
Other contracts with premium pay range from $1.00 - $3.00 per hour. When the employee is
performing the added duty (such as a Field Training Officer), they receive the premium pay. A
similar hourly rate structure could be established for performing translator services. The hourly rate
for an LPA III ranges from $17.83 - $20.34.
PRO’S TO A STIPEND:
Keeps the extra pay separate from the regular LPA III wage scale for tracking/reporting/budgeting
purposes.
A stipend can be added or removed without disruption to employee status or base compensation.
Depending on how many hours are spent providing translator services, it could be more affordable
for the Court than other methods of providing services.
Multiple employees can be approved to receive the stipend (it is the Court’s intent at this time to
provide the stipend to two employees in LDC, and one in UDC).
Having an employee available who can provide translator services is more beneficial than having to
arrange for an outside interpreter in advance, and possibly having them wait for hours to be utilized.
CON’S TO A STIPEND:
Depending on how many hours are spent providing translator services, it could be more expensive
for the Court than other methods of providing services.
Fair application of the stipend may be difficult; what if more employees want to be qualified than
the budget can cover? What will the process be to ensure fair selection? What if an employee
wishes to obtain State Certification – will they be guaranteed the higher stipend if it is not in the
budget?
PRO’S TO HOURLY PREMIUM PAY:
Keeps the extra pay separate from the regular LPA III wage scale for tracking/reporting/budgeting
purposes.
Premium pay can be added or removed without disruption to employee status or base
compensation.
Hourly pay will provide more accurate compensation since it is based on hours actually spent
providing translator services.
Hourly premium pay can be provided to more employees because they are only being paid for
services rendered; not for being “on call”.
CON’S TO HOURLY PREMIUM PAY
Setting the right amount may be challenging given the range between premium pay that exists in
other contracts vs. the published survey rates for interpreter services.
Fair application of the premium may be difficult, as with the stipend.
DESIGNATION VIA JOB DESCRIPTION
Rather than compensate for translator services through a stipend or premium pay, the Court could create a
Legal Process Assistant/Translator position, and translator services would be an essential function. The new
wage scale would be slightly higher than an LPA III to reflect these extra duties.
PRO’S TO DESIGNATION VIA JOB DESCRIPTION:
No separate pay to track.
CON’S TO DESIGNATION VIA JOB DESCRIPTION:
It may be more difficult to find candidates who meet the minimum qualifications.
It will be more difficult to grant different levels of pay for different levels of
qualification/certification – we may have to create three levels of the position with different wage
scales.
It cannot be taken away as easily – the employee would have to be reclassified to a different
position, but then the Court would not be able to backfill without getting approval for additional FTE
or terminating the employee no longer qualified.
GENERAL PRO’S/CON’S TO TRANSLATOR PAY
PRO’S:
Provides those employees qualified to perform additional duties that benefit the Court with
recognition via compensation.
Provides the Court with instant access to services – no need to schedule an outside translator or use
the Language Line.
CON’S:
Translator pay has not been implemented by policy or contract in Kittitas County; this may set a new
expectation and if the BOCC decides to provide this additional pay it should be clearly noted in the
Memorandum of Understanding with the Union that it is strictly due to the Court’s obligation to
provide interpreter services specifically for Court-related translation. There are many other
departments who could make the case for interpreter pay because it would help them provide
better service to the public.
It could add another level of complexity to wage studies (another reason why stipend or premium
pay may be more beneficial than designation by job description – it keeps the comparison more
apples to apples among district courts in WA; according to the survey only 15% of courts use staff
translators).
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF KITTIT AS
ST ATE OF WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION
NO.: 2018-068
IN THE MATTER OF SETTING SALARIES FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS
(Excluding Judges)
WHEREAS: The Kittitas County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) believes the salaries of
elected officials should be subject to periodic public review; and
WHEREAS: In 2017 the BOCC created a "Citizens' Advisory Committee on Salaries for Elected
Officials of Kittitas County" ("Salary Committee") via Resolution 2017-134; and
WHEREAS: The Salary Committee met on January 22 and February 26, 2018, to review data and
formulate a compensation strategy and recommendation to the BOCC for wages through 2022; and
WHEREAS: The Constitution of the State of Washington prohibits the salary of an elected
official being diminished during the course of their existing term, and salaries for Elected Officials
must be set prior to filing week, which begins May 14, 2018; and
WHEREAS: The State of Washington establishes, in consultation with the Citizen's Commission
on Salaries for Elected Officials, the salaries of Superior Court Judges, and Kittitas County Policy
establishes District Court Judges salaries based on Superior Court Judges' salaries; and
WHEREAS: Effective September 1, 2013 the State established its portion of the Prosecutor wage
per SSB 6297 to be S6,325.38, and the County has amended its portion through annual Resolution,
with the last being Resolution 2017-204; and
WHEREAS: The salaries for County Commissioner - Districts 1 & 2 were set prior to the filing
period for said offices in 2016, and the salary for Commissioner District 3 must now be set for 2019-
2022, and the salaries for Assessor, Auditor, Clerk, Coroner, Treasurer, Prosecutor, and Sheriff must
now be set for 2019; and
WHEREAS: The BOCC met during two HR Study Sessions, March 27 and April 10, to review the
Salary Committee's recommendations, and consider alternative implementation methods;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Kittitas County Board of Commissioners hereby adopts
the following:
Section 1: All prior resolutions insofar as they are inconsistent herewith are repealed.
Section 2: The salaries of Kittitas County's elected officials have previously been established as
follows:
i!J"FoT?i05'7,rlJ,=:fIt.,&J:li%ili -':-y'J'J-a'=I,2C-z?tai'%-.;"i"". 'f:ui'Jm::I*IJ"'1ZTL.7-"
};y-att00q '%Wq!Hl'ttt-a atiVi#'
i7nlX; ' s@ Y'. .Walizyyl; d Ig-Q%%b '.'=-:'%,2 f84pTh:7::j
County Assessor 3s,iffiTh 'S5,859 S6,035 S6/186 TBD TBD
County Auditor S5,688 S5,859 S6,035 S6,186 TBD TBD
County Clerk S5,688 S5,859 '!,6,035 S6,186 TBD TBD
County Coroner S5,688 !>5,859 '56,035 !,6/186 TBD TBD
County Treasurer S5,688 S5,859 S6,035 S6/186 TBD TBD
County Prosecutor*910,87 4.62 911,011.10 911,151.67 Sll,272.33 TBD TBD
County Sheriff S7,386 S7,608 S7,836 S8,032 TBD TBD
County Commissioner 1 S5,919 S6,067 I1S6,219 . S6,374 S6/565 S6,762 I
County Commissioner 2 S5,919 %,067 i1S6,219 1S6,374 S6/565 S6,762
County Commissioner 3 !55,919 S6,067 S6,219 i*ii i5.s5zz\TBD , TBD
For 2019-2022, the salaries will be as indicated in the attached Addendum
Items to note:
* Effective September 1, 2013 the State increased its portion of the Prosecutor wage per SSB 6297
from 56,201.33 to !>6,325.38. The salary increases reflected in the Addendum for 2019-2022 are
applied to the County's portion of the salary only.
*Prior to the first full week of May 2020, the salaries for Commissioner Districts I and 2 will need to
be determined. The Salary Committee will meet in 2019 to begin work on a new recommendation
for the terms commencing in January 2023.
Section 3: The salaries of the Superior and District Court Judges are set by the Washington
State Salary Commission and will be reviewed and adjusted as necessary to comply with State Law
and the Policies and Ordinances of Kittitas County.
Section 4:The salary increases set forth in this Resolution shall be effective as of January 1,
2019.
ADOPTED this 26'h day of April, 2018.
111111111111
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
KITTIT AS CO , WASHINGTON
Fiie O: n '. Vice-Chair
Gl ell, CoaFnmissioner
2019-2022 Salaries for Elected Officials
Addendum to Resolution 2018-068
BOCC Auditor Assessor Clerk Coroner Treasurer Sheriff Prosecutor State County
2017 Comp 7,188 7,085 7,085 7,085 7,085 7,085 8,506 12,960.00 *see special note RE: Prosecutor
Annualized 86,256 85,020 85,020 85,020 85,020 85,020 102,072 155,520.00 6325.38 6634.62
2018 88,844 87,571 87,571 87,571 87,571 87,571 105,134 157,908.46 6325.38 6833.66 1.03
2019 91,509 90,198 90,198 90,198 90,198 90,198 108,288 160,368.58 6325.38 7038.67 1.03
2020 94,254 92,904 92,904 92,904 92,904 92,904 111,537 162,902.50 6325.38 7249.83 1.03
2021 97,082 95,691 95,691 95,691 95,691 95,691 114,883 165,512.44 6325.38 7467.32 1.03
2022 99,994 98,562 98,562 98,562 98,562 98,562 118,329 168,200.68 6325.38 7691.34 1.03
*The Prosecutor wage is partially funded by the State ($6,325.38). The recommended increase would be
applied to the County's portion, including the percentage calculation for out-years.
Current 2018 6,374 6,186 6,186 6,186 6,186 6,186 8,032 11,272.33 6325.38 4,946.95
Annualized 76,488 74,232 74,232 74,232 74,232 74,232 96,384 135,267.96
2019 78,783 76,459 76,459 76,459 76,459 76,459 99,276 137,048.86 6325.38 5,095.36 1.03
2020 81,146 78,753 78,753 78,753 78,753 78,753 102,254 138,883.19 6325.38 5,248.22 1.03
2021 83,580 81,116 81,116 81,116 81,116 81,116 105,322 140,772.55 6325.38 5,405.67 1.03
2022 86,087 83,549 83,549 83,549 83,549 83,549 108,482 142,718.59 6325.38 5,567.84 1.03
Bring to BOCC rate 0.00%103.04%103.04%103.04%103.04%103.04%103.04%103.04% 103.04%*
Match + 3% trend 103.00%106.13%106.13%106.13%106.13%106.13%106.13%102.69%106.13%
Current 2018 6,374 6,186 6,186 6,186 6,186 6,186 8,032 11,272.33 6325.38 4,946.95
Annualized 2018 76,488 74,232 74,232 74,232 74,232 74,232 96,384 135,267.96
(match BOCC) 2019 78,783 78,783 78,783 78,783 78,783 78,783 102,294 138,907.65 6325.38 5,250.26 1.061312
(3% trend for all) 2020 81,146 81,146 81,146 81,146 81,146 81,146 105,363 140,797.74 6325.38 5,407.77 1.03
(market for all) 2021 97,082 95,691 95,691 95,691 95,691 95,691 114,883 165,512.44 6325.38 7467.32 1.380852
(3% trend for all) 2022 99,994 98,562 98,562 98,562 98,562 98,562 118,329 168,200.68 6325.38 7691.34 1.03
2021 RECOMMENDED 97,082 95,691 95,691 95,691 95,691 95,691 114,883 165,512.44
2021 Status Quo TRENDED 83,580 81,116 81,116 81,116 81,116 81,116 105,322 140,772.55 BOCC X3
IMPACT 13,502 14,575 14,575 14,575 14,575 14,575 9,561 24,740 40,506 147,682
Total Impacts 34% AVE Payroll Cost
Standard 3% per year 70,139 93,986
All positions in 2021 147,682 NET (takes into account 3% budgeted per year)197,894
2018 to 2021 (raw)217,820 291,879
2022 (3% trend)29,225 Commissioner District 3 has to be set through 2022 39,162
RECOMMENDATION - Set wages to 2017 Surrounding Comps and escalate at 3% per year
CURRENT WAGES WITH TREND - 3% PER YEAR ("Status Quo")
IMPLEMENTATION: Bring Non-BOCC to Current BOCC Rates in 2019 then increase all to trended Market Rate in 2021
*Because the Sheriff and Prosecutor are paid more
than the BOCC, the same 3.04% that was given to the
other Elected Officials to the bring them to the 2019
BOCC rate as been applied to their 2019 rate.
KVH Workplace Health - Services and Contract Pricing
Service IContractRate
Drug/Alcohol Testing
Collection Only: Federal or Non-Federal S22
Observed Collection 530
Drug Screen, Complete: Federal 550
Drug Screen, Complete: Non-Federal §40
Drug Screen: Non-Federal, POC 14-panel 540
Drug Screen: Non-Federal, POC 12-panel 540
Drug Screen: Non-Federal, POC 11-panel 540
Drug Screen: Non-Federal, POC 10-panel 540
Drug Screen: Non-Federal, POC 7-panel S40
Drug Screen: Non-Federal, POC 5-panel 540
Drug Screen: Confirmation Test !>25 per drug
Drug Screen: MRO Review S25
Breath Alcohol Test S35
Breath Alcohol Test - Confirmation S25
Physical Examinations
General History and Physical S65
DOT/CDL Exam S90
FAA Exam - no EKG 5150
FAA Exam - with EKG/Interpretation S225
Asbestos/Lead Exposure Exam - Initial S285
Asbestos/Lead Exposure Exam - Periodic/Exit 5250
Medical Surveillance Exam - Baseline S285
Medical Surveillance Exam - Annual/Exit S250
Return to Work Exam S85
Fit for Duty Exam-Basic S85
Fit for Duty Exam-Limited S115
Fit for Duty Exam-Intermediate 5150
Regulatory Screening and Testing
OSHA Respirator Medical Questionnaire
Review
S30
Respirator Mask Fit Test: Qualitative S25
Audiogram - Audiometer 550
Hearing Conservation Program Evaluation 520
Spirometry 550
EKG with Interpretation a9ro
Tuberculin Skin Test: 1 step S35
Tuberculin Skin Test: 2 step S35 each
Body Fat Testing - Calipers !>8
Laboratory Testing
Phlebotomy 520
Quantiferon Gold TB Test 580
Varicella Titer S67
Hepatitis B Surface Antibody Titer 515
MMR Titer S35
Rubella Titer 515
Measles Titer 915
Mumps Titer §15
Immunizations
Vaccine Administration (per encounter)S22
Varicella Vaccine S125
Hepatitis B Vaccine PER DOSE (3 doses)530
MMR Vaccine S75
Tetanus, Diptheria, Pertussis (T-Dap) Vaccine S45
BY:
Signature
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
LIMITED LIABILTY COMPANY
Pursuant to Title 25 of the Revised Code of Washington, the undersigned does hereby submit
this Certificate of Fomiation for the purposes of forming a limited liability company.
1. The name of the limited liability company is: Greater Columbia Behavioral Health, LLC
2. The limited liability company is to have a perpetual existence.
3. The name of the initial registered agent is: James F. Bell.
4. The initial registered office is
410 N. Neel st., Suite A
Kennewick, WA 99336
CONSENT TO APPOINTMENT AS REGISTERED AGENT
I, James F. Bell, hereby consent to serve as Registered Agent in the State of Washington for the
above named Limited Liability Company. I understand that as the agent for the limited liability
company, it will be my responsibility to accept Service of Process on behalf of the limited
liability company; to forward license renewals and other mail to the limited liabiIity company;
and to immediately notify the Secretary of State in the event of my resignation or of any changes
in the Registered Office address.
(Signature of Registered Agent)
James F. Bell
(Printed Name)(Date)
5. The address of the principal place of business, and the mailing address of the limited
Iiability company is :
101 North Edison Street
Kennewick, WA 99336
6. Management of the limited liability company is vested in one or more managers:
[X] YES [ ] NO
7. Any other provision the limited liability company elects to include are attached. See
Section 7.1 Attached.
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION Page l of 12
8. This Certificate is executed by each of the nine members as noted below:
Member County
Asotin
Benton
Columbia
Franklin
Garfield
Kittitas
Walla Walla
Whitman
Yakima
Address
p.o. Box 250
620 Market St.
341 E. Main St.
1016 N. 4I'1 Ave.
p.o. Box 278
205 W. 5I" st., Suite 108
p.o. Box 1506
404 N. Main Street
128 N. 2nd st., Rrn 232
City
Asotin
Prosser
Dayton
Pasco
Pomeroy
Ellensburg
Walla Walla
Colfax
Yakima
State Zip Code
99402
99350
99328
99301
99347
98926
99362
99111
98901
9. Tliis Certificate will be effective upon filing, unless an extended date/time appears here:
10. This Certificate may be executed in any number of counterparts, all such counterparts
shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument, and each of said counterparts
shall be deemed and original hereof.
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK IISTTENTIONALLY.
SIGNATURES FOLLOW.]
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION Page 2 of 12
, 2018.
MEMBERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles are executed on this day of
ASOTIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Chairi'nan
Member
Member
Constituting the Board of County
Cominissioners of Asotin County,
Washington.
Attest:
Clerk of the Board
Approved as to form:
Prosecuting Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION Page 3 of 12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles are executed on this day of , 2018.
BENTON COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Chairman
Member
Member
Constituting the Board of County
Corninissioners of Benton County,
Washington.
Attest:
Clerk of the Board
Approved as to form:
Deputy Prosecuting Attomey
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION Page 4 of 12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles are executed on this day of , 2018.
COLUMBIA COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Chairman
Member
Member
Constituting the Board of County
Commissioners of Columbia County,
Washington.
Attest:
Clerk of the Board
Approved as to form:
Prosecuting Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION Page 5 of 12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles are executed on this day of , 2018.
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Chairman
Member
Member
Constituting the Board of County
Commissioners of Franklin County,
Washington.
Attest:
Clerk of the Board
Approved as to fon'n:
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION Page 6 of 12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles are executed on this day of , 2018.
GARFIELD COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Chairman
Member
Member
Constituting the Board of County
Commissioners of Garfield County,
Washington.
Attest:
Clerk of the Board
Approved as to form:
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION Page 7 of 12
INWITNESSWHEREOF,theseArticlesareexecutedonthis '&'dayof J%iS , 2018.
KITTIT AS COUNTY, WASHINGTON
'Meffl
Constituting the Board of County
Corni'nissioners of Kittitas County,
Washington.
Approved as to fon'n:
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION Page 8 of 12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles are executed on this day of , 2018.
WALLA WALLA COUNTY,
WASHINGTON
Chairman
Member
Member
Constituting the Board of County
Commissioners of Walla Walla County,
Washington.
Attest:
Clerk of the Board
Approved as to form:
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION Page 9 of 12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles are executed on this day of , 2018.
WHITMAN COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Chairman
Member
Member
Constituting the Board of County
Coini'nissioners of Whih'nan County,
Washington.
Attest:
Clerk of the Board
Approved as to form:
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION Page 10 of 12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these Articles are executed on this day of , 2018.
YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Chairinan
Member
Member
Constituting the Board of County
Commissioners of Yakima County,
Washington.
Attest:
Clerk of the Board
Approved as to fon'n:
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION Page 11 of 12
7.1 LIMITATION OF MEMBER'S LIABILITY:
No member shall be personally liable for any debts, losses, or liabilities of the company
beyond the member's contributions and any obligations of the member to make
contributions, except as otherwise specifically provided by law. No member shall have
liability to the company or its members or managers for monetary damages for conduct as
a member, except for a member's acts or omissions that involve intentional misconduct,
gross negligence, a knowing violation of the law, conduct violating RCW 25.15.231, or
for any transaction from which the member has personally received a benefit in money,
property or services to which the member was not legally entitled. If the Washington
Limited Liability Company Act is hereafter amended to authorize company action further
eliminating or limiting the personal liability of members, then the liability of a member
shall be eliminated or limited to the full extent peri'nitted by the Washington State
Limited Liability Act, as so amended. Any repeal or modification of this section shall
not adversely affect any right or protection of a member of the company existing at the
time of such repeal or modification for or with respect to an act or omission of such
member occurring prior to such repeal or modification.
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION Page 12 of 12