My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
StffRrpt_Resolution_Exhibit A_Exhibit B_Exhibit C 07282026
>
Meetings
>
2026
>
08. August
>
2026-08-04 2:00 PM - 2:00pm Public Hearing
>
StffRrpt_Resolution_Exhibit A_Exhibit B_Exhibit C 07282026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2026 12:09:14 PM
Creation date
7/30/2026 12:06:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
8/4/2026
Meeting title
2:00pm Public Hearing
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Public Hearing to extend the Moratorium on Transfer of Development Rights for One (1) Year.
Order
1
Placement
2:00pm Public Hearing
Row ID
147067
Type
Hold Public Hearing
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Department of Commerce: Submittal ID 2026-S-11466 <br />Barriers and solutions to provide adequate housing for all residents: <br />The housing element does not include documentation of programs and actions needed to achieve housing <br />availability, as required by RCW 36.70A.070 2 d ii . We recommend amending the Housing Element to <br />include a list of barriers to affordable housing needs and actions needed to remove those barriers to align <br />with statute.5 <br />Based on recent GMHB cases, we also recommend identifying the number of units that require additional <br />funding to be developed and gaps in local funding needed to achieve these affordable housing needs, <br />documenting which available local funding tools or incentives are already being used, and which tools <br />can be implemented to help close the funding gap.6 <br />Land capacity for housing needs of all economic segments: <br />Additionally, we recommend that Kittitas County review land capacity for extremely low-income housing <br />to ensure sufficient capacity for all housing needs as required by RCW 36.70A.070(2)(c). The County's <br />Land Capacity Analysis (LCA) indicates sufficient capacity of housing for all income levels; however, <br />the analysis is unclear whether it includes housing typologies likely to serve the community's extremely <br />low-income households between 0-30% Area Median Income (AMI). Please review and integrate <br />recommendations from our housing element guidance 7 <br />The County must also allow permanent supportive housing (PSH) in enough places to accommodate their <br />share of permanent supportive housing needs (0-30% PSH) for consistency with RCW 36.70A.070(2)(c). <br />Within our review, we were unable to identify where zones will allow PSH. To be consistent with this <br />requirement, the County will need to allow permanent supportive housing with its development <br />regulations update to ensure there is capacity for the 0-30% PSH needs. <br />Future land use map within the main body of the comprehensive plan: <br />We recommend adding the future land use map to the main body of the Land Use Element instead of <br />separately providing these as appendices. Please consider these changes to the Land Use Element and <br />subarea plans prior to adopting the final updated comprehensive plan. <br />RCW 36.70A.070 outlines central features of land use elements, including maps upon which other <br />elements of the comprehensive plan rest. To ensure consistency across the adopted plan, also consider <br />adding clearly labeled future land use maps within each subarea plan. Land Use Maps should show land <br />use designations, city limits, and UGA boundaries. <br />Land Use Designations and Zoning Classifications: <br />Commerce has significant concerns with the land use and zoning table in the Land Use Element, Table 2- <br />1. LAMIRDs and the Planned Unit Development (PUD) are covered separately below. We like that the <br />County identifies the three general land use types of Resource Lands, Rural, and Urban and this <br />framework should be retained. The remaining concerns with Table 2-1 are as follows: <br />• We recommend providing more distinction in the Urban land use category. Typical minimum <br />urban distinctions are residential, commercial, industrial, institutional/governmental, open space, <br />and MPR. Simply identifying it as Urban is far too broad and does not make it clear to the public <br />how the urban land is going to be treated. <br />• Urban land use designations are required to allow urban densities.' The zoning associated with <br />the urban land use designation includes the following rural zoning classifications: Agriculture 3, <br />Rural 3, Rural 5, and Forest and Range. These zones combined account for approximately 640 <br />acres, which is more than 11% of the unincorporated UGA within the county. Commerce <br />recommends the county only apply urban zones to the urban land use designation. If the county <br />wishes to maintain rural zoning in these areas, the county could consider removing the areas from <br />the UGA if the areas removed from the urban growth area are not characterized by urban growth <br />or urban densities, and revised urban growth area is contiguous, does not include holes or gaps, <br />and will not increase pressures to urbanize rural or natural resource lands. <br />5 Guidance for Updating Your HousingElern (Chapter 4; pages 54-76). <br />6 Guidance for Updating Your Housing Element (Chapter 4; pages 63-65 and Appendix B: Adequate Provisions <br />Checklist) <br />7 Guidance for Updating Your Housing Eleme, (Book 2; pages 33-39) <br />8 RCW 36.70A.110(2) <br />Page: 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.