Comments_Combined_KimleyHorn - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

facilities would be additive to a recreation system already at capacity. This wording could easily be the basis for development regulation or permit changes to allow facilities that would not otherwise be approved. Section 2.1.1...This section would add new policies to the County Comp Plan encouraging Second Houses and Recreational Housing Growth and sets the stage for new development regulations specific to this new "non-permanent" land use (implied to have lesser impacts). However, in reality no housing should be considered as permanent 2nd housing, because it's simply a temporary use which can be converted to year round occupancy at will. In fact since covid in 2020, upper county has seen a significant portion of it's existing 2nd housing and recreational housing stock converted to year round occupancy with year round impacts. But even if it were assumed that 2nd houses could actually stay 2nd houses in perpetuity, they would still be occupied during the peak summer months when public services are already stressed. From an impacts perspective all houses are equal and can be covered by existing zoning and development regulations, a new category of housing is not warranted. Section 2.2.1...Strike the last sentence in the last paragraph... "By recognizing these shifting land-use patterns, the County can better align its zoning and resource protections with the modern economic realities of both the agricultural and recreational sectors.". If no changes to existing zoning and development regulations are desired then any language contemplating potential "better alignment of zoning" is not needed as it implies the county contemplates or encourages changes. Section 2.2.2 Under Urban Growth Areas - last paragraph "Recreational Residential and Second Home Communities" - see comments on Section 2.1.1 above Section 2.2.6 Sub-Area Plans last paragraph "To effectively manage the impacts of thisgrowth and the unique challenges posed by the county's varied terrain, the County will continue to develop and implement subarea planning. This localized planning approach allows the County to direct land usage and resource management more precisely, ensuring that both the natural environment and anticipated population increases are managed in a sustainable and orderly manner." This verbiage strongly implies a desire to re-plan rural areas to accommodate "population" increases. Sub- area planning is by definition an opportunity to change zoning and development regulations, increase density and population. Population growth should be accommodated inside the UGA. Section 2.2.7 Private Property and Water Rights under Utilities - Urban style sewer systems, even private ones, especially systems that include actual sewage treatment plants, serve to encourage urban style housing and urban style densities in rural areas that would not be feasible otherwise. They are expensive to build and operate and therefore, in the long run, often encourage additional development densities to pay for them. In the event of failures, which is not uncommon, it is likely that the county will be drawn in by state regulators as the guarantor of last resort. Urban sewer systems should not be encouraged in rural areas.