Laserfiche WebLink
2. The paragraph of Section 2(D) labeled "Review, Ranking and Recommendations by <br />LTAC's" shall be amended to read as follows: <br />Review, Ranking and Recommendations by LTAC'sµ The County will compile and distribute all <br />applications to the municipalities for review by each LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) for <br />review, ranking, and funding recommendation, which will then be processed as follows: <br />a. Each municipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) will review every application and <br />assign it a rating based upon an agreed scoring system. <br />b. Each municipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) will rank the applications in order <br />by score. <br />c. Each municipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) will produce a recommended <br />funding level, considering each. application in order of rank, and including any additional <br />comments which provide insight into the respective funding decision. If any applications <br />are disqualified, an explanation shall be provided. <br />d. The ratings, rankings, and recommendations from each LTAC (or appointee(s) if no LTAC) <br />will be submitted to the LTAC Clerk. <br />e. Each municipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if there is no LTAC) must adhere to the agreed - <br />upon grant scoring methodology and meet deadlines for submission. <br />f. The CLTAC Clerk will provide at least two weeks' notice, via email, of any deadline(s) to <br />all municipalities, and each CLTAC member. <br />g. If a municipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if there is no LTAC) does not adhere to the <br />agreed -upon grant scoring methodology and/or does not meet process deadlines, that <br />municipality will not be allowed to score the applications relevant to that grant cycle and <br />participate in the presentation meeting and voting process. However, that municipality must <br />still contribute funding as described herein, and such funding will be allocated based on the <br />scoring from the compliant municipalities' submissions For purposes of this paragraph, as <br />long as one member from a municipality's LTAC (or appointee(s) if there is no LTAC) <br />adheres to the agreed -upon grant scoring methodology and meets process deadlines, that <br />municipality will be allowed to score applications, and participate in the presentation <br />meeting and voting process. <br />3. Section 2(D)(2) shall be amended to read as follows: <br />2) LTAC Work Group Review., The County will compile the ratings, rankings, and <br />recommendations along with the applications and submit them to a combined county -wide LTAC <br />work group which will be comprised of three members from the LTAC of each participating <br />municipality (or appointees if there is no LTAC) for consideration. The County will act as Chair <br />of the work group. After submission: <br />a. The work group will hold a public meeting where it will provide an opportunity for <br />applicants to make a presentation before the work group and answer any questions from <br />work group members. <br />b. The work group will review the recommendations, deliberate publicly, and make final <br />recommendations based upon the master list. All decisions will be made by simple majority <br />Page 2 of 11 <br />Page 408 of 452 <br />