Laserfiche WebLink
2025 Hazard Mitigation Plan <br />Kittitas County, Washington <br /> <br /> <br />Chapter 4: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment 148 <br />4.6.6.7. FEMA NRI Expected Annual Loss Estimates <br />A landslide NRI EAL score, and rating represent a community's relative level of expected building and <br />population loss each year due to landslides when compared to the rest of the United States. The EAL <br />score is positively associated to a community’s risk; therefore, a higher EAL score results in a higher Risk <br />Index score. Table 4-89 outlines the landslide EAL for Kittitas County. <br />Table 4-89. Landslide Expected Annual Loss (FEMA National Risk Index) <br />Jurisdiction Population <br />Equivalence <br />Building <br />Value <br />Agriculture <br />Value <br />Total <br />Expected <br />Annual <br />Loss <br />Expected <br />Annual <br />Loss <br />Score <br />Rating <br />Kittitas County $61,729 $19,713 n/a $81,441 78.2 Relatively <br />High <br />Expected annual loss scores are calculated utilizing an equation that combines values for exposure, annualized frequency, and historic loss <br />ratios (Expected Annual Loss = Exposure x Annualized Frequency x Historic Loss Ratio). <br />4.6.6.8. Landslide Risk Index Scores <br />The FEMA landslide Risk Index score and rating represent a community's relative risk for landslide when <br />compared to the rest of the United States. Table 4-90 illustrates the landslide Risk Index rating and score <br />for Kittitas County. <br />Table 4-90. Landslide Risk Index (FEMA National Risk Index) <br />Jurisdiction Rating Score <br />Kittitas County Relatively High 76.9 <br />Risk Index scores are calculated using an equation that combines scores for Expected Annual Loss due to natural hazards, Soci al <br />Vulnerability and Community Resilience (Expected Annual Loss x Social Vulnerability / Community Resilience = Risk Index). <br /> <br />Table 4-91 represents the landslide Total Risk Score for the Kittitas County, based on the Risk <br />Assessment Methodology, as defined in Section 4.3 of this Plan. <br />Table 4-91. Landslide Total Risk Score <br />Hazard <br />Event <br />Probability Consequence Total Risk <br />Probability <br />Factor Extent Vulnerability Impact Consequence <br />Score <br />Total Risk <br />Score* <br />Landslide 2 12 12 13 37 39 <br />Consequence: Sum of all weighted factors. <br />Extent: Sum of the weighted Extent factors. <br />Vulnerability: Sum of the weighted Vulnerability factors. <br />Impact: Sum of the weighted Impact factors. <br />Total Risk Score = Probability x Consequence <br />* Normalized to 100 <br />Total Risk Score Legend <br />Classification Probability <br />Factor Extent Vulnerability Impact Consequence <br />Score <br />Total Risk <br />Score <br />Low (L) 1 0 – 6 0 – 6 0 – 12 0 – 24 0 – 24 <br />Medium (M) 2 7 – 12 7 – 12 13 – 26 25 – 50 25 – 52 <br />High (H) 3 13 – 18 13 – 18 27 – 39 51 – 75 53 and above <br />The legend—specifically the assignment of low, medium, and high—provides an additional means to qualitatively assess the probability factor, sum of <br />weighted factors, and the total risk scores for each hazard. The Consequence Score represents the sum of the Extent, Vulnerability, and Impact Factors. <br />The Total Risk Score is a measure of Probability and Consequence. <br />