Kittitas County CEMP_Completed_Review_Letter (Final)

Home Browse Search

Washington State Emergency 3/19/2025 Management Division Page 7 TIER II – State Suggestions CEMP Location Recommendation to Meet Legal Obligations Reference Framework, WA CEMP, CPG 101 ESF 14 ESF 14 has been superseded by the development of the National Disaster Recovery Framework and is being replaced in the National Response Framework to coordinate lifelines. While a Long-Term Recovery annex is no longer necessary, you may opt to keep it (consider renaming to ESF 21, or 22, etc. to maintain consistency with guidance) or use it to begin building a Recovery Plan to compliment your response efforts (for more information talk to the EMD Recovery Coordinator about the implementation of the Washington Restoration Framework). NRF, NDRF, WA CEMP ESF 15 – Notices The topics covered within ESF 15 encompass aspects of nearly all of the activities of other ESFs and is a difficult Support Annex to develop. Considering this, your ESF 15 Annex demonstrates a high-level of development and forward thinking. There are only a few considerations which can be addressed. Discuss how information pertaining to the potential impacts of secondary hazards is relayed to the public. Discuss mechanisms which will be in place for the family reunification process. Discuss the notifications provided for emergency transportation information. Lastly, discuss the possibility of providing announcements for upcoming community meetings (i.e. involving state officials, local authorities, damage assessments, etc.). National Response Framework, National Disaster Recovery Framework, WA CEMP TIER I – Optional CEMP Location Recommendation to Meet Legal Obligations Reference General The biggest concern with accreditation entities and requirements is detailed explanations of process and procedures. It is often not enough to simply address that you EMAP