11062024 PHrg_BOCC_Anual Docket 01-10 Complete file

Home Browse Search

The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them t make i decision. Signature: Name of signee:Chace Pederson Position and Agencylorganization:Planner IlKittitas Coun" Date Submitted: 8/07124^._._-- D. supplemental sheet for nonproject actions hel (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general,it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;emissions to air;pro- duction,storage,or release of toxic or hazardous substances;or production of noise? • No groundwater will be withdrawn from wells or discharged into groundwater as a result of this non-project action. Future development proposals would be subject to SEPA ally and would include a development permit review of any impacts to groundwater and drinking water. • This non-project action will have no direct effects on air quality. The Kittitas County Comprehensive Plan does include polices and the county code provides regulations to guide growth and development over the 20-year planning period,2017-2037. it is likely that projected population growth could lead to increased air emissions. • indirectly, the Comprehensive Plan and the growth and development projects for Kittitas County could increase traffic generating additional vehicle emissions,construction of public and private infrastructure and structures could generate localized air emissions,and additional homes burning wood could generate air emissions. • No toxic or hazardous chemicals will be stored, used or produced as part of this non-project action.Future development proposals would be subject to SEPA individually as well as development permit review by the County and both processes would include a review of any toxic or hazardous chemicals. • No noise will be created as part of this non-project action. Future development proposals would be subject to SEPA individually as well as development permit review by the County and both SEPA Environmental checklisttWAC 197-11-960) July 2016 —--— —— Page 23 of 26