Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTERS: COMMUNITYAND STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT <br />Figure 5 2 Public Survey 1 Results Summary — Prioritization of Improvements <br />safety <br />(improve/maintain safe move- <br />ment of people and vehicles) <br />Mobility <br />(improve flow of traffic) <br />Economic vitality <br />(economic well-being for <br />surrounding communities) <br />Environment and Health <br />(protect human health <br />and the environment) <br />20 40 60 80 <br />Percent of respondents who ranked each option: ■ 1st 2nd 3rd 4th <br />Information gathered provided a foundation for development of the project's alternatives, as well as <br />criteria for the evaluation process. <br />Public Survey 2: February 2024 <br />A public survey was available both at the in -person Open House and online. The survey invited <br />community members to identify their preferred alternatives) and to share any additional insights <br />with the County and WSDOT. As presented in Chapter 4, the majority of respondents indicated <br />Alternative 2 as their <br />preferred alternative Figure 5-3 Public Survey 2 Results Summary — Preferred Alternative <br />(see Figure 5-3). Please 1.) what alternative would you like to see as part of the 1-90 improvements <br />refer to Table 5-3 for between Easton and Cie Elum? Select all that apply. <br />an overview of the 100% <br />survey results. A total 90% <br />of 74 respondents t <br />provided information <br />about their preference i0 <br />and their reasoning. W 00. <br />Appendix i provides v 50% <br />more information about 1.2 40% <br />the survey methodology cy <br />and results. 20%CA <br />0 <br />10% 1 . I . <br />ri <br />0% <br />a ,01INoaze `C`a� ��Q scams C Je �.��� �L`42 has& <br />C� Preferred Alternative of Responding Individuals <br />VOLUME I: FEASIBILITY REPORT 1-90 Corridor - Easton to Cle Elum Feasibility Study 1 76 <br />