Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION CRITERIA <br />Table 4-6 Tier 2 Evaluation —1-90 Alternatives Weighted Scores <br />Alt 1 <br />1-90 Outside <br />Widening <br />Alt 2 <br />1-90 Median <br />Widening <br />Alt 3 <br />1-90 Reversible <br />Lanes <br />Safety <br />..................................................................................................................... <br />20.0 <br />20.0 <br />22.5 <br />Transportation Demand <br />8.6 <br />8.6 <br />7.9 <br />..................................................................................................................... <br />Freight Mobility <br />6.7 <br />6.7 <br />6.7 <br />.......................................................................................................•............. <br />Environmental <br />6.0 <br />6.0 <br />6.0 <br />..................................................................................................................... <br />Resiliency <br />..................................................................................................................... <br />9.0 <br />7.5 <br />7.5 <br />Equity/Inclusion <br />6.7 <br />8.3 <br />8.3 <br />............................................................................................................................................................................... <br />Relative Cost of <br />3.3 <br />3.3 <br />0.0 <br />Alternatives <br />Total Score <br />60.2 <br />60.4 <br />58.9 <br />VOLUME is FEASIBILITY REPORT 1-90 Corridor - Easton to Cle Elum Feasibility Study 1 69 <br />