Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION CRITERIA <br /> Figure 4-1 Tier 1 Evaluation Summary by Alternative- Weighted Score <br /> 80.0 <br /> 70.0 <br /> 60,0 <br /> 50.0 <br /> 40.0 <br /> 30.0 <br /> 20.0 <br /> 30.0 <br /> 0.0 <br /> Alt 1 Alt 2 AI[3 AI[4A Alt 48 Alt S Alt 6 <br /> •Relative Cost of Alternatives 3.3 3.3 3.3 OA 0.0 1.7 6.7 <br /> ■Equity/Inclusion 6,7 9.3 8.3 5.0 6.7 5.0 5.0 <br /> •Resiliency 9.4 9.4 9.4 1.9 1.9 1.9 0.0 <br /> •Environmental 6.0 9.0 9.0 1.5 1.5 0.0 2.5 <br /> •Freight Mobility 6.7 6.7 6.7 1.7 1.7 5.0 0.0 <br /> •safety 21,0 21.0 24.0 1&0 18.0 12,0 0.0 <br /> •TransportationDemand 8.6 8.6 8.6 4.3 4.3 2.9 0.0 <br /> ■Transportation Demand ■Safety Freight Mobility •Environmental •Resiliency •Equity/Inclusion ■Relative Cost of Alternatives <br /> VOLUME 1: FEASIBILITY REPORT 1-90 Corridor- Easton to Cle Elum Feasibility Study 62 <br />