Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 4: ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION CRITERIA <br /> Table 4-3 presents a summary of weighted explanations for the scoring, are included in <br /> scores for each alternative by Project Goal, Appendix F. A comprehensive environmental <br /> and the diagram in Figure 4-1 illustrates how evaluation was also performed, and findings <br /> the alternatives compared to each other. are presented in Appendix G. <br /> Detailed evaluation worksheets, along with <br /> Table 4-3 Tier 1 Evaluation - Weighted Scores <br /> Alt 1 Alt 2 Alt 3 Alt 4A Alt 4B Alt 5 Alt 6 <br /> 1-90 Outside 1-90 Median 1-90 North RouteNorth Route South No <br /> Widening Widening Reversible SR 903 Bullfrog Road Route Build <br /> Lanes Extension <br /> Safety 15.0 15.0 18.0 15.0 15.0 12.0 0.0 <br /> ..................................................................................................................................................................... <br /> Transportation <br /> 8.6 8.6 8.6 4.3 4.3 2.9 0.0 <br /> Demand <br /> ..................................................................................................................................................................... <br /> Freight Mobility 6.7 6.7 6.7 1.7 1.7 5.0 0.0 <br /> ..................................................................................................................................................................... <br /> Environmental 6.0 9.0 9.0 1.5 1.5 0.0 1.5 <br /> ..................................................................................................................................................................... <br /> Resiliency 9.4 9.4 9.4 1.9 1.9 1.9 0.0 <br /> ..................................................................................................................................................................... <br /> Equity/Inclusion 6.7 8.3 8.3 5.0 6.7 5.0 6.7 <br /> ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................- <br /> Relative Cost of <br /> 3.3 3.3 3.3 0.0 0.0 1.7 6.7 <br /> Alternatives <br /> Total Score 55.6 60.3 63.3 29.3 31.0 28.4 14.8 <br /> VOLUME 1: FEASIBILITY REPORT 1-90 Corridor Easton to Cle Elum Feasibility Study 1 61 <br />