Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER ]: INTRODUCTION <br /> 1.4 Study Process and criteria used to evaluate each alternative were <br /> Approach carefully selected to accurately measure how <br /> well each alternative aligned with the project's <br /> Based on meaningful discussions with purpose. Figure 1-2 provides a general overview <br /> stakeholders and insights into public concerns, of the process employed during this study, <br /> the County and WSDOT developed a study and Table 1-2 briefly describes each step in the <br /> process designed to ensure that alternatives process. <br /> effectively addressed the project's needs.The <br /> Figure 1-2 Feasibility Study Process and Approach <br /> Public, <br /> Stakeholder,and <br /> Agency Input <br /> -- - • - - - - - <br /> Project Purpose <br /> and - . <br /> Public,Stakeholder,and Agency Input <br /> Preliminary Evaluate and <br /> Alternatives Compare Evaluate and <br /> Alternatives Compare Top <br /> Three Alternatives <br /> (Tier 1 and Revised (Tier 2 Evaluation) <br /> Evaluation Tier 1 Evaluations) <br /> Criteria <br /> Select <br /> Alternative(s)to <br /> Move Forward <br /> VOLUME I: FEASIBILITY REPORT 1-90 Corridor-Easton to Cle Elum Feasibility Study 1 6 <br />