Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER S: COMMUNITYANDSTAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT <br /> Table 5-3 Public Survey 2, February 2024—Survey Results <br /> Alternative #Votes Reasons <br /> Alternative 1: 25 • Prioritize options that keep traffic on the freeway (1-90) <br /> Widen 1-90 to . Reasons include reducing congestion and improving emergency <br /> the Outside response times <br /> Avoid diverting traffic onto county roads to minimize hazards for <br /> residents <br /> • Emphasize safety, environmental impact, and long-term solutions <br /> • Preserve neighborhood integrity and minimize disruption to <br /> residents <br /> • Considerations include minimizing costs, preserving private <br /> property, and reducing environmental impact <br /> ................................................................................................................................................................... <br /> Alternative 2: 46 • Advocacy for economical options to minimize congestion and <br /> Widen 1-90 in hazards <br /> the Median • Prioritize keeping traffic on 1-90 to aid emergency response and <br /> safety <br /> • Utilization of existing freeway right of way for cost-effectiveness <br /> • Support for widening 1-90 to improve traffic flow and safety <br /> • Preference for options minimizing impact on local roads and <br /> residents <br /> • Consideration of snow removal efficiency and access management <br /> • Proposal for inward expansion to minimize environmental impact <br /> • Emphasis on maintaining safety, environmental impact, and <br /> property rights <br /> • Support for expanding 1-90 lanes to accommodate traffic and <br /> improve safety <br /> • Recognition of cost-effectiveness and reduced habitat <br /> destruction <br /> • Proposal for cost-saving measures such as utilizing existing <br /> median space <br /> • Advocacy for additional lanes on 1-90 in both directions for <br /> efficiency <br /> Im <br /> VOLUME I: FEASIBILITY REPORT 1-90 Corridor- Easton to Cle Elum Feasibility Study 1 77 <br />