Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 5: COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT <br /> Figure 5-2 Public Survey 1 Results Summary—Prioritization of Improvements <br /> I I <br /> Safety <br /> (improve/maintain safe move- <br /> ment of people and vehicles) <br /> Mobility i <br /> (improve flow of traffic) I <br /> Economic Vitality <br /> (economic well-being for <br /> surrounding communities) I I <br /> Environment and Health <br /> (protect human health <br /> and the environment, <br /> 0 20 40 60 80 100 <br /> Percent of respondents who ranked each option: t 1st end 3rd 4th <br /> Information gathered provided a foundation for development of the project's alternatives, as well as <br /> criteria for the evaluation process. <br /> Public Survey 2: February 2024 <br /> A public survey was available both at the in-person Open House and online.The survey invited <br /> community members to identify their preferred alternative(s) and to share any additional insights <br /> with the County and WSDOT.As presented in Chapter 4,the majority of respondents indicated <br /> Alternative 2 as their <br /> preferred alternative Figure 5-3 Public Survey 2 Results Summary—Preferred Alternative <br /> (see Figure 5-3). Please 1.)what alternative would you like to see as part of the 1-90 improvements <br /> refer to Table 5-3 for between Easton and Cie Elum?Select all that apply. <br /> an overview of the 100% <br /> survey results.A total 90% <br /> of 74 respondents 60% <br /> provided information <br /> about their preference �Q <br /> and their reasoning. ,Q 60% <br /> Appendix J provides 50% <br /> C <br /> more information about a o 40% <br /> the survey methodology 30% <br /> and results. 20% <br /> 0 <br /> 4 <br /> 10% a <br /> 0% <br /> Ae <br /> �o�ati yQq Pie Pam+ tie ���� Pie` P�e� li�e <br /> Preferred Alternative of Responding Individuals <br /> VOLUME I: FEASIBILITY REPORT 1-90 Corridor-Easton to Cle Elum Feasibility Study 1 76 <br />