2023 Docket Enabling Ordinance - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2023 Docket Enabling Ordinance December 19, 2023 Page 81 commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies needed for adequate transportation facilities within six years. A. The County’s review of all applications for development permits shall include a concurrency evaluation. B. The concurrency evaluation and determination shall be completed prior to: 1. Issuance of administrative approval/denial of the project permit if SEPA review is not a requirement of the project; or 2. Issuance of the DNS, MDNS or DS if SEPA review is a requirement of the project; or 3. Issuance of the staff report to the hearings examiner if there is a hearing before the hearings examiner and SEPA review is not a requirement of the project. C. Development permits for phased developments shall have the concurrency evaluation completed for the entire project. An applicant may elect to have the concurrency evaluation undertaken for less than the entire project if and only if: 1. The County Engineer or designee agrees to such limited evaluation; and 2. Each phase shall include all of the infrastructure to service that phase;. and 3. There is a written note included in the preliminary approval for such phased development that the traffic concurrency is limited only to the specific phases for which approval has been provided. D. If the concurrency evaluation meets the adopted roadway level of service standard for each impacted arterial roadway (including state highways), the County Engineer or designee shall issue a finding of concurrency, according to the provisions of KCC 12.04.02.090. This finding of concurrency shall be based on the specific land uses or trip generation identified in the TIA and is required for developments that are expected to generate more than forty-one (41) daily vehicle trips. If the concurrency