My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RFP Scoring Matrix
>
Meetings
>
2023
>
08. August
>
2023-08-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
RFP Scoring Matrix
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2023 2:22:44 PM
Creation date
8/10/2023 2:22:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
8/15/2023
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Request to Approve a Notice for a Request for Proposals (RFP) for New or Expanded Services and Programs to be Funded from the 1/10th of 1% Mental Health and Chemical Dependency Tax and Request to Publish a Public Notice
Order
18
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
107456
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Scoring Matrix 1/10th of 1% p.3 <br /> <br /> Did the applicant fill out the “Successful Benchmarks” grid? <br /> <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How completely were the tables filled out? <br /> Are the project’s goals, strategies, and objectives clear? <br /> Do the goals clearly align with the project description and the <br />County priorities? <br /> <br />15 <br />Budget Narrative Eligible <br />Points <br />Reviewer’s <br />Score <br />1. Funding Utilization <br /> <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Is there a detailed description of how funds will be used for the <br />project? <br /> <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? <br /> Is it clear how the funds will be spent to support the proposed <br />project? <br /> Is the proposed use of funds appropriate to fulfill the project’s <br />scope of work? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />2. Other Support <br /> <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Is there a description of other types of support for the project? <br /> <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? <br /> Is it clear how other types of support will be used for the project? <br /> What is the degree of other support? <br /> Are County funds the only resource for the project? <br /> Are there guaranteed or uncertain forms of support, or both? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />3. Sustainability <br /> <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Is there a description of how the project would or wouldn’t be <br />sustained if the County funds were no longer available? <br /> <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? <br /> Is it clear how the funds affect the sustainability of the project? <br /> Can the project be sustained either fully or partially without County <br />funds in the future? <br /> Are there any plans for future sustainability without County funds? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.