My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RFP Scoring Matrix
>
Meetings
>
2023
>
08. August
>
2023-08-15 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
RFP Scoring Matrix
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2023 2:22:44 PM
Creation date
8/10/2023 2:22:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
8/15/2023
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Request to Approve a Notice for a Request for Proposals (RFP) for New or Expanded Services and Programs to be Funded from the 1/10th of 1% Mental Health and Chemical Dependency Tax and Request to Publish a Public Notice
Order
18
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
107456
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Scoring Matrix 1/10th of 1% p.2 <br /> <br />3. County Priorities: Youth, veterans, the justice involved, and those at <br />high risk of suicide <br /> <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Did the applicant indicate which County priorities their project <br />addresses? <br /> Is there a compelling description of how the priorities would be <br />addressed? <br /> <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? <br /> Is there a clear and strong connection between the proposed <br />project and the County priorities? <br /> How many priorities are addressed in this proposal? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />4. Partnerships <br /> <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Did the applicant list key partnerships for the project? <br /> Are the partners’ roles defined? <br /> <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? <br /> Is it clear how community partnerships are a part of the project? <br /> How many partnerships are listed? <br /> What kind of roles do they have in the project? <br /> Are there any key partners missing? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />5. Gaps and Duplication in Services <br /> <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Did the applicant describe how the project fills a gap in services? <br /> Did the applicant describe how the project isn’t a duplication of <br />services? <br /> <br />Considerations for scoring: <br /> How well was this question answered? <br /> Does the project fill a gap (or more than one) in the community? <br /> Is there a duplication of services present? If so, is the program <br />different enough that it would still be valuable in offering another <br />option for people seeking assistance? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />6. Goals and Objectives <br /> <br />Were the following items addressed? <br /> Did the applicant fill out at least two Goals and Objectives tables? <br /> Are the goals SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, <br />and Time-bound)? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.