My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
KittitasCountyCWPP_September2022_Amendment_Only (2)
>
Meetings
>
2022
>
10. October
>
2022-10-04 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
KittitasCountyCWPP_September2022_Amendment_Only (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2022 1:03:18 PM
Creation date
9/29/2022 12:58:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
10/4/2022
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution Amending the 2018 Community Wildfire Protection Plan and to authorize the Chairman's Signature on the Adoption Page with Amendment
Order
6
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
94348
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 Year Plan Landscape Goals <br />Overarching: <br /> Improve safety and fire protection for people and homes. <br /> Increase resilience to drought and wildfire by creating open canopy <br />forest with resistant tree species and a large tree component. <br /> Maintain large tree, dense forest in the least fire and drought prone <br />areas to sustain dense forest dependent wildlife species. <br /> <br />Reduce wildfire risk: <br />Fire risk is high to very high along most of the northern and southern <br />ridges that encompass the valley (Fig. 1). As fires are most likely to <br />come from the north, the highest priority treatments are on the lower to <br />upper slopes of Cle Elum ridge (northern ridge), and along the lower to <br />mid slopes of the southern ridge. In the central part of the valley, the <br />agricultural lands and extensive floodplain forests along the Yakima <br />river provide a natural fire break. Treatments to reduce fire risk are low <br />priority along the north facing, upper slopes of the southern ridge, <br />where dense forest is sustainable. Some areas are predicted to burn as <br />low-intensity ground fires, which will have beneficial <br />effects by consuming fuels. Most of these areas are <br />recently treated areas on DNR and private land. <br /> <br />Prepare for climate change: <br />Projected warming will increase moisture stress and <br />thus probability of wildfire and insect outbreaks. By <br />mid-century, 45% of the planning area is projected to <br />have moisture stress levels currently associated with <br />woodland and shrub-steppe (Fig. 2). Treatments to <br />aggressively reduce density and shift to drought- <br />tolerant species on currently high, and future ex- <br />treme, deficit areas will help maintain forest cover on <br />sites for as long as possible. <br /> <br />Sustain wildlife habitat: <br />Large patches of white headed wood pecker habitat exist on the south facing slopes of Cle Elum Ridge and in the far eas tern portion <br />the planning area. Treatments on dry sites will increase this habitat if prescriptions incorporate habitat considerations. Ha bitat for <br />moderate to closed canopy dependent species exists on north facing slopes of the southern ridge and in the northwest corner. <br />Treatments are not recommended in most of this area. Fires that burn at characteristic severity in all forest types can benef it habitat <br />by creating snags and stimulating higher understory plant abundance and diversity. <br /> <br />Enhance rural economic development: <br />Reducing fire risk will help maintain recreational opportunities and associated economic activity. Commercial treatments are possible <br />on many of the recommended acres. However, the small size of many parcels, the high number of vacation homes, and limited roa d <br />access on Forest Service land make commercial treatments difficult in many areas. Non -commercial treatments will require major <br />investments and will provide a major source of work for local contractors. Warming trends will make it increasingly difficult to sustain <br />long term timber production in the eastern and northern portions of the planning area. <br />Landscape Highlights <br /> <br />The Cle Elum planning area combines high fire risk along the northern and southern ridges with extensive development in the valley <br />and foothills. Ownership of forestland is dominated by small private landowners (56%), along with Forest Service (19%), the N ature <br />Conservancy (14%), and the DNR (8%). Based on current conditions data from 2017, treating an estimated 15,500 - 23,000 acres of <br />dense forest is recommended to reduce fire risk to communities and move the move the landscape into a resilient condi- <br />tion. Community wildfire preparedness efforts are currently scaling up to address the large need to treat parcels with homes . Creating <br />additional defensible space on Nature Conservancy, USFS, and undeveloped private land near communities is also a priority. Ma inte- <br />nance treatments on existing open forest are needed on 2,500 -5,500 acres. In sum, treating 27-43% of the forested acres is recom- <br />mended. This planning area will be expanded to include the Cle Elum Lake watershed in the 2020 planning cycle. <br /> <br />Cle Elum Planning Area <br />Landscape Evaluation Summary <br />Total Acres Forested Acres Treatment Goal (Acres) <br />89,479 66,811 18,000 - 28,500 <br />Definitions (see Appendix for data sources and methods): <br />Dry: Ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir dominated forests that historically supported ground fires every 5-25 years. Moist: forests that historically had <br />mixed severity fires and were dominated by fire resistant species on sites with more frequent fire (~30 -80 years) and fire intolerant species such as <br />grand fir on sites with less fire. Cold: Upper elevation mixed conifer forests with high severity fires every 80-200+ years. Woodland/Steppe: Grass and <br />shrublands that may have oak woodlands or up to 10% cover of conifer trees. Size classes: Large: overstory diameter (OD) > 20”; Medium: OD 10-20”; <br />Small: OD <10”. Canopy cover classes: Open: <40%; Dense: >40%. Fuels: shrubs, grasses, small trees, duff, & dead woody material. <br /> <br />Current <br />Years 1981-2010 <br />Future <br />Years 2041-2070 <br />Figure 1. Wildfire risk to homes, infrastructure & forests. <br />Figure 2. Current and future moisture deficit levels. <br /> <br />Moisture deficit is a measure of <br />water stress faced by plants. <br /> Risk is a combination of fire probability, <br /> fire intensity, and susceptibility to fire.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.