My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RES-2022-100-Airport-Stratrgic-plan
>
Meetings
>
2022
>
05. May
>
2022-05-03 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
RES-2022-100-Airport-Stratrgic-plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2022 11:55:28 AM
Creation date
5/13/2022 11:54:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
5/3/2022
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Fully Executed Version
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution Acknowledging and Adopting the Bowers Field Strategic Plan
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
88743
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPENDIX ll: PRELIMINARY AIRPORT ASSESSMENT <br />AIRPORT OVERVIEW <br />direct ownership model is a valid option for consideration. However, direct ownership <br />increases the airport sponsor's risk. Focusing on the development of land for <br />commercial real estate provides a good illustration of the factors that must be taken <br />with the direct ownership option. Direct ownership involves the airport sponsor <br />assuming the role of developer and, therefore, the obligations and risks inherent in <br />that role. The airport sponsor owns the entire project and receives all the profits. <br />Should the project fail to meet projections, the airport sponsor assumes the losses of <br />the failed project, as opposed to being a traditional lessor. Given that most airports <br />are not tax paying enterprises, such losses do not provide a tax incentive to them, as <br />they might to a tax paying private party. The second significant risk is the financing. <br />Should the project fail to generate sufficient cash flow to amortize debt, the airport <br />sponsor is responsible for all shortfalls. The reward for assumption of all these risks is <br />the receipt of 100% of the profits of successful developments. Accordingly, solid <br />financial forecasts are crucial to any analysis of the viability of a project to determine <br />whether such profits are likely to be sufficient to make the risk worthwhile. <br />NON.AERONAUTICAL REVENUE FUNDING SOURCES <br />certain restrictions related to non-aeronautical use, the FAA recognizes that in order for <br />certain airports to fulfill their obligation of making the airport as self-sustaining as <br />possible under the circumstances existing that it is sometimes necessary for the FAA <br />to release the airport sponsor of these restrictions when certain lands and <br />improvements are not needed in the near term for aeronautical use. <br />Therefore, another excellent revenue funding source for airports can be the (1) leasing <br />of airport land for the development of lessee owned improvements for non-aeronautical <br />use and (2) leasing of land and improvements and facilities owned by the airport <br />sponsor for non-aeronautical use by lessees. lt is important to remember that, <br />generally, the FAA must approve any non-aeronautical use of airport land and <br />improvements designated for aeronautical use purposes. ln Figure 3, some examples <br />of non-aeronautical land and improvement uses are identified <br />Airport Strategic Business Plan, 0712612021 25
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.