My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Res-2021-173
>
Meetings
>
2021
>
11. November
>
2021-11-16 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
Res-2021-173
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2021 11:21:23 AM
Creation date
11/22/2021 11:20:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
11/16/2021
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Fully Executed Version
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Request to Approve a Resolution for the Meadows Development Agreement Resolution (DV-19-00001)
Order
1
Placement
Board Discussion and Decision
Row ID
83269
Type
Resolution
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ffi <br />Robert D. Johns Aktired) <br />Michael P. I{oruoe <br />Darrell S. Mitsunal;a <br />Duana T. Kolou$kovd <br />i,?icki S. C)rrictr <br />De'anWilliarns <br />October 30,2019 <br />Lindsey Ozbolt, planning Official <br />Community Development Services <br />Kittitas County <br />411 N, Ruby Street, Suite 2 <br />Ellensburg WA 99926 <br />Re: Project FjleNo. DV-19.00001, MarianMeadows <br />Dear Ms. Ozbolt: <br />on behalf of Easton Ridge Land company (ERLC), Martens Ente{prises, LLc and theMarian Meadows deveropmentproposal, ; irr""d;'drloiio*irrg written comments onthe above referenced-Apilicatiott ald irrl pt"p*q;;g#" for impacts ro the Easronschool District (the "District')-. As t;; *" aware, ERLC i-as volunteered to pay mitigationfor impacts ro the District in;he am;;t of $s00;;;"r*ir"ro for the Marion Meadowsresidentiar de'eropment. To the best of o* i"r.-r-"i;;;, ,ht, is the first time a projectdeveloper in Kittitas.co*ty rr*-uoiforr* a p"y *iiig"ion, of any amount, ro theDistrict for residential housing units a"J the first grr" rrr" <br />-niruict <br />has ever asked for suchmitigation from any nerv residential development. <br />The District has responded that it believ.es this-mitigation is insufficient, but has notprovided any concrete infbrmation on which it reties. Enic has three concerns with theDistrict's response. Fift,,t" Di;i;;; urgrrm"ot that the number of students fiom MarianMeadows would abolish trtt oirtri"itll"Jt s$o9i i""G rr"rrs is misteading, if notentirely incorrect' second, the District has historicany;;;;.quired mitigation from newdevelopments. Thus, the Dicrict" o*t'rrtoi.r. rruu, rrJ;djs supposedry dire siruarion,not Marian Meadows. Thif, in righr orir* ib";;: .q*t* *, ross.in pubric fi.rnding tothe proportionar imoacts ofitile Miria"il:"{"::i#;;il.*oyrd, not onry be wrong,but also unlawful under "tupt"i[giic Rcw,irt"-{t* Lnvrronrnenrar poricy Act("SEPA") and chapter g2.02 R'cw, ,i" sru* impact fr, ;;;;rnrmy mirigation stature. <br />Easton School District's F,unding <br />The District relies heavily on its status as a small school District, as defined in srate law,and the expectation that the students <br />"oa"o ry Ha"ri* M;;dr;; *tt u. greater than reportsconclude' ffeating a tipping point rorttre pisriet's f".ilil;;, iv'ierher this latter point holdsany truth to it is essential io tne oitttictt argument. As demonstrated below, the Districtalreadv tacks smail district rtut* roi *rf"rit, pr;;;;:llrre is arso a significanrdifference belween even the high*rt est-i-riates and rir" u'.tu.i ,rumb.r of students \,IarianMeadows would have to contrif,ute to J.p*u. trre nistrict oiii, ,**rr district sralus for the <br />ft (425) 4s1-2a12. Fz (42F;) 481-281a112O1 SE 8th st. ' sujre 120 . Eellevue, wA 9aoo4www. jmmklan d u sElaw, co-m'
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.