My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-05-24-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2021
>
06. June
>
2021-06-01 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2021-05-24-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2021 12:49:09 PM
Creation date
5/27/2021 12:48:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
6/1/2021
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
77301
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hi Nicole, <br />To set the framework for my questions — this is my first time involved in this plan, so I may have questions <br />/ thoughts that were addressed in 2016. Basically, it's a very comprehensive plan. I don't have any <br />results based information to compare with this plan that would allow me to suggest any changes. <br />However, I did have a couple of questions. <br />Pg 3 Inventory assets — including existing public and private open spaces, park and recreation <br />facilities, and recreational services that have been developed to -date by Roslyn, Cie Elum, <br />Ellensburg, Kittitas County, Washington State, and private non-profit and for- profit organizations <br />(If this is a comprehensive plan for Kittitas County, why is this not going to Hyak or to Vantage? <br />For future planning, extending those boundaries and indicating that additional areas will be <br />survey to begin the assessment process for additional resources that would strength and support a <br />County -wide Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces plan. <br />• Where and how was the Recreation and Tourist Demand survey's conducted? How was the local <br />data reported? I'm asking because it would be interesting to compare survey results (if you are <br />administering them again) by the same sectors. It might also be interesting to compare response <br />change / rate / interest — to see where change and interest have happened. Hopefully, responses <br />are being gathered from some of the outlying areas — that would support any change or growth <br />interest in expanding this plan to support additional parks, outdoor spaces, etc. beyond Roslyn <br />west or Cie Elum east. <br />• This plan is very comprehensive — what has been achieved since 2016 and will those <br />achievements be used to help prioritize outcomes and goals? <br />What would be the process to add the Cie Elum Downtown Association to section 12.0? <br />Thank you for including me, <br />Debbie <br />Debbie Bogart <br />Executive Director <br />123 E First Street <br />509-433-7330 <br />CLE ELUM <br />DOWNTOWN <br />ASSOCIATION <br />The Nature Conservancy via email: <br />Good Morning Nicole, <br />Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on the 2021 Recreation and Tourism Plan. We <br />appreciate the County's efforts to advance this important work. <br />The Nature Conservancy is referenced six times in the plan and most of those references are accurate <br />and supported from our perspective. However, there is one reference that we request is adjusted. <br />Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.