Laserfiche WebLink
standards established by the Conservation Commission through <br />interagency agreement with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and <br />the Natural Resource Conservation Service; <br />vi. Through a formal grant program established by the Legislature or <br />the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife for fish <br />habitat enhancement or restoration; and <br />vii. Through other formal review and approval processes established by <br />the Legislature. <br />b. Fish habitat enhancement projects meeting the criteria of p.iv(a) of this <br />subsection are expected to result in beneficial impacts to the environment. <br />Decisions pertaining to fish habitat enhancement projects meeting the criteria <br />of p.iv(a) of this subsection and being reviewed and approved according to <br />the provisions of this Section are not subject to the requirements of RCW <br />43.21C.030 (2)(c). <br />c. A hydraulic project approval (HPA) permit is required for projects that meet <br />the criteria of p.iv(a) of this subsection and are being reviewed and approved <br />under this Section. An applicant shall use a joint aquatic resource permit <br />(JARPA) application form developed by the Office of Regulatory Assistance to <br />apply for approval under this chapter. On the same day, the applicant shall <br />provide copies of the completed application form to the Washington State <br />Department of Fish and Wildlife and to each appropriate local government <br />agency. Local governments shall accept the application as notice of the <br />proposed project. The Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife shall <br />provide a fifteen-(1S)-day comment period during which it will receive <br />comments regarding environmental impacts. Within forty-five (45) days, the <br />Washington State Department of Ecology shall either issue a permit, with or <br />without conditions, deny approval, or make a determination that the review <br />and approval process created by this Section is not appropriate for the <br />proposed project. Ecology shall base this determination on identification <br />during the comment period of adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated by <br />the conditioning of a permit. lf Ecology determines that the review and <br />approval process created by this Section is not appropriate for the proposed <br />project, Ecology shall notify the applicant and the appropriate local <br />governments of its determination. The applicant may reapply for approval of <br />the project under other review and approval processes. Any person aggrieved <br />by the approval, denial, conditioning, or modification of a permit under this <br />Section may formally appeal the decision to the Hydraulic Appeals Board <br />pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. <br />d. The County may not require permits or charge fees for fish habitat <br />enhancement projects that meet the criteria of p.iv(a) of this subsection and <br />that are reviewed and approved according to the provisions of this Section. <br />3. Developments not required to obtain shoreline permits or local reviews. <br />Exhibit C SMP Update | 178.07.030 Permit Exemptions Page 8 of 10