Laserfiche WebLink
CenterFuse Broadband Feasibility Report <br /> The download speeds in this table get really large if extended even further into the future. If the demand <br /> for broadband download speed continues to grow at 21% annually, then the need in 2030 would be 438 <br /> Mbps, in 2035 would be 1.1 Gbps, and in 2040 would be 2.9 Gbps. It's easy to say that such future <br /> speeds are not possible, but recall that just 20 years ago, a 1 Mbps DSL connection was considered a <br /> blazingly fast broadband connection. A fiber network will be able to keep up with this kind of future <br /> demand. There is already fiber gear today that can deliver 10 Gbps broadband to residential customers. <br /> It's possible that the cable company networks could also keep up with this demand, but it would require <br /> several major upgrades in technology to do so. The Charter network in Ellensburg can deliver download <br /> speeds up to a gigabit today. However, the secret that Charter and other cable companies don't want to <br /> talk about is that they can't give that much speed to everybody unless they build a lot more fiber and <br /> greatly reduce node sizes. Charter would need to upgrade to DOCSIS 4.0 to get speeds faster than 1 <br /> gigabit. <br /> It's not hard to put this prediction into perspective. Cable companies that serve around 65% of all <br /> broadband customers in the country already advertise minimum speeds today of between 100 Mbps and <br /> 200 Mbps. That speeds vary by market due to the condition of local coaxial networks like we see in <br /> Ellensburg. But in markets where the coaxial cable in in good condition, big cable companies already <br /> provide 200 Mbps broadband today as the target speed for their introductory broadband product. <br /> It's not hard to imagine that seven years from now that the national definition of broadband ought to be <br /> around 250 Mbps. That doesn't mean that the FCC will continue to increase the regulatory definition. <br /> Last year they rejected numerous filing asking them to increase the 25/3 Mbps definition. There is a <br /> political downside if the FCC increases the definition of broadband—it would reclassify numerous <br /> homes as not having broadband. Today the 25/3 Mbps definition of broadband is lower than the reality <br /> of what many homes need, but my guess is that there will have to be an even bigger difference before an <br /> FCC will react and change the definition. <br /> One of the conclusions that can be reached by this analysis is that any new network built today ought to <br /> be capable of meeting the expected broadband speeds of the next decade. The only technologies capable <br /> of meeting the projected future needs for bandwidth are fiber-to-the-premise, cable company hybrid- <br /> fiber networks, and some wireless technologies using millimeter wave spectrum that are just now being <br /> trialed in a few markets. <br /> Cable companies are only going to able to provide speeds above 1 gigabit by implementing another <br /> round of expensive upgrades. There is a lot of speculation in the industry that cable companies would <br /> upgrade to fiber-to-the-home rather than make such an upgrade. Altice already is supposedly upgrading <br /> its properties to fiber. But they have fallen far behind their announced schedule and are concentrating <br /> first larger markets before upgrading secondary markets like Ellensburg. <br /> Page 53 <br />