My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-02-22-minutes-public-works-study-session
>
Meetings
>
2021
>
03. March
>
2021-03-16 10:00 AM - Commissioners' Agenda
>
2021-02-22-minutes-public-works-study-session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:47:58 PM
Creation date
3/11/2021 1:43:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting
Date
3/16/2021
Meeting title
Commissioners' Agenda
Location
Commissioners' Auditorium
Address
205 West 5th Room 109 - Ellensburg
Meeting type
Regular
Meeting document type
Supporting documentation
Supplemental fields
Alpha Order
a
Item
Approve Minutes
Order
1
Placement
Consent Agenda
Row ID
73736
Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KITTITAS COUNTY <br />DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />PUBLIC WORKS — BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT <br />STUDY SESSION DATE: February 22, 2021 <br />TOPIC: Public Works Permit Fee Review <br />ACTION REQUESTED: Direct Staff <br />LEAD STAFF: <br />Mark R. Cook <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Reduce the number of current Public Works (PW) permits from 44 to 23 and reduce the <br />number of flood control zone permits from 9 to 5. <br />BRIEFING SUMMARY: <br />• PW has not been good tracking time spent processing permits. <br />• Management believes too many permits exist. <br />• Reducing the number of permits assists staff in reduced job coding. <br />• Combining numerous permits to a single permit with a base charge and collecting <br />actual time spent provides cost savings to clients. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Departments of the Board standardized fee rates together in 2017 using the same <br />consultant software package. <br />The Board elected to restrain many PW permits to 25% cost recovery. <br />Poor PW time recording defines a problem. <br />Management proposes simplifying the permit process and restructuring cost <br />recovery. <br />DISCUSSION: <br />For the past several months, PW management has been delving into permit fees. The <br />lack of historic tracking on some permits, and good tracking on others results in our <br />consideration of the entire permit structure. PW performs project cost accounting so that <br />all time is tracked whatever the activity. As we have reviewed the 2017 work that went <br />into each permit and compared to what we are spending, we are well under collecting for <br />our most accessed permits. A previous Board elected to cap PW fees — mostly at the 25% <br />level of predicted cost from the 2017 effort. While it would be simple to increase 2017 <br />fees to 50% of forecast cost, we are contemplating a revised approach to permit fee cost <br />recovery. <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />Public Works "Work Session Staff Report", 2021 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.