Laserfiche WebLink
resulted in minimal impacts to the environment and the community. Issues and element of concerns were <br />documented and addressed within the applications and it should be noted, entitlement level requests within <br />these applications are a 20% plus reduction of the dwelling units studied under Alt. #5. <br />In March of 2017, the County determined that the Dec. 22, 2016 applications were incomplete and provided <br />direction and concern about specific issues to be addressed. ERLC reevaluated the applications and <br />resubmitted to the County on May 17, 2017. ERLC received notice that the application was deemed <br />completed early in June of 2017. <br />The resubmitted applications addressed: <br />• water district issues and needed connections, <br />included the determination that automatic fire suppression would be required throughout the plat <br />addressing the concerns of an all -volunteer department, <br />• re -design of public and private roadway to comply with County Road Standards, and <br />• provided monetary funding for possible impacts to the local School District. <br />All items to be further addressed within a Development Agreement with Kittitas County. <br />Each section noted will provide our assessment, response and intended actions. <br />Of particular concern to ERLC is negotiating with public agency leadership that is openly opposed to the <br />development. This is true of membership within the Easton School District Board and Kittitas County Fire <br />District Commissioners. <br />Kittitas County has transparently required that ERLC address and comply with provisions of KCC, State <br />GMA Title 36.70A and the County's Comprehensive Plan. Within these regulations it also required state <br />agencies, inclusive of School, Water and Fire Districts to comply and adhere to GMA guidelines. <br />If Easton School District #28 and Kittitas County Fire District #3 had followed the intent of GMA, requests <br />by ERLC for information and documentation of measures to be addressed with proposed lot creations could <br />have easily been addressed. As the record shows, notice of this development was provided in 2003. In the <br />case of School District #28, action was not taken until after approvals and entitlements were in place in 2018. <br />ERLC questions why both of these agencies have ignored the growth within their respective district (ESD <br />#28 - 299 new dwelling units, KCFD #3 — 66 new dwelling units) until the applications for Marian <br />Meadows were filed. It appears to be a clear case of targeting one development over the question of growth <br />in general. It should also be noted that neither District has reached out to Kittitas County with discussions of <br />impact fees toward future growth to date. <br />In ERLC's planning process, what became apparent is the Easton Community is experiencing issues with <br />water service levels which will need to be addressed by the Easton Water District. In working with and <br />focusing on issues of water supply and infrastructure within the Water District, ERLC will be providing <br />mitigation to the School District, Fire District and overall community. <br />It should also be noted that Easton Water District, unlike the School and Fire District, is compliant with <br />GMA with Comprehensive Planning documentation and information that proponents of grow and develop <br />can refer to. <br />Question #10 - <br />The proposed plat of Marian Meadows is a mixture of uses within a 445.42 acre setting. Uses include single <br />family, attached multi -family, large parcel single family and uses allowed under CUP 17-0001. All uses fall <br />