Laserfiche WebLink
approvals were some specific elements added by Kittitas County Commissioners with no notice, discussion, <br />or input from the applicant. <br />With approvals in place under Ordinance 2018-006, planning commenced to address identified conditions <br />with the formation and preparation of the Development Agreement with Kittitas County. Shortly after this <br />planning commenced, it was derailed with the June 2018 filing of an appeal by Easton School District #28 of <br />Marian Meadows approvals under the Land Use Petition Act. A settlement was reached to resolve the <br />dispute through this Development Agreement process. <br />On March 29, 2019, an application for the Marian Meadows Development Agreement was submitted after <br />discussions and consultation with Kittitas County planning staff. The application was reviewed by County <br />staff and the prosecuting attorney's office and deemed complete as of June 3`d, 2019. <br />As of this date, the Development Agreement application has been reviewed and commented on by State and <br />Federal jurisdictions, with added comments and oversight by Kittitas County, other public agencies and the <br />Easton community. All public comments and input have been reviewed by ERLC to make needed <br />adjustments. <br />Observations: <br />Applications for the Marian Meadows project have been formulated under the guidelines of RCW 36.70A — <br />"Washington State's Growth Management Act" (GMA) and in compliance with Kittitas County Code and <br />Comprehensive Plan in place at the date of application. <br />While the GMA has many deficiencies, it has provided strategic guidance with the following: <br />• predetermined growth directives on a community wide basis, <br />• transparency in how those growth directives are put in place and will be administered, <br />• measures for proposed growth to help fund impacts of development, <br />• even playing field for development proponents and those concerned with a given development <br />proposal, <br />• directs growth in areas targeted for growth, <br />These provisions have been useful for all participants within Washington State's development community. <br />We see a failure of these provisions to serve their intended purpose when participants fail to comply with the <br />guidance they are intended to provide. In this case, the local Easton area public agencies (School District #28 <br />and Fire District #3) having no written planning directives or guidelines in place for developers or planning <br />agencies as provided under RCW 36.70A. Multiple requests by ERLC for specific information to evaluate <br />mitigation have gone unanswered. The only written correspondence received prior to the filing of legal <br />proceedings under the LUPA by either of these agencies was funneled through Kittitas County CDS. <br />In the case of ESD # 28, on July 18, 2018, in response to Ordinance 2018-006 and the approval of the plat of <br />Marian Meadows and after the filing of legal appeals under LUPA, ERLC attended a meeting with School <br />District officials and legal counsel. Within this meeting, ERLC was presented a draft document, labeled <br />Capital Facilities Plan (2018-2024) outlining mitigation deemed required by the School District for <br />development impacts. This was obviously prepared in reaction to the approval of Marian Meadows and seeks <br />to fund a decade of inaction by the School District from Marian Meadows alone. Please see Exhibit C to the <br />Development Agreement. <br />SUMMARY: <br />In compiling land use applications for submittal in 2016, ERLC relied heavily on documentation within the <br />published FEIS conducted by Kittitas County. A significant point within the FEIS was that Alternate #5 <br />s r,C......... s :.. <br />