DV-19-00001 Marian Meadows Development Agreement Master File

Home Browse Search

B RV Commercial Applications Finding of fact 36.2 page 23 of Kittitas County Ordinance 2018-006 third sentence "There is a proposed recreational service center, but it is likewise a small scale and intended to service the recreational vehicles for the units stored on site." I believe it is necessary for this requirement to be restated in the development agreement and a program put in place to assure compliance. In addition a strong statement that the CUP will be null and void if this condition is violated. General Comments I would like to remind the Commissioners that this proposal has been an ongoing extending more than a decade. Although the applicant has made substantial improvements to the proposal there are still outstanding issues which must be resolved. Schools are addressed in condition 30.3 page 29 of Kittitas County Ordinance 2018-006. The final two sentences of the paragraph state "The applicant shall contact Easton School District and develop mitigation measures. Mitigation measures shall be included in the development agreement. The mitigation offered in the attachment to the propose development agreement was not mitigated with the school district and is unacceptable. (It is shameful, immoral and disgusting.) CDS and the County Attorney can say well that is what the EIS says. That statement is nothing more a lack of ability to understand or care about the school funding and facilities requirements. Any agreement between the applicant and the School District must be based on real facts not an opinion that all the County has to do is exert minimum effort and say that's the way it is. A development agreement is intended to mitigate and come to an agreement that will allow public facilities to continue operations without forcing existing residents to absorb the cost of additional facilities which new development will require. This item must go back and require sincere mitigation between the applicant and the School District. Fire District Mitigation. 1 do not believe any mitigation has taken place between the Fire District and the applicant to date. Ordinance 2018-006 made a requirement that such mitigation take place. Water Although DOH has approved a sufficient number of hook ups I do not believe the applicant has come to an agreement for service and facilities improvements. Ordinance 2018-006 Findings of Fact 34.1.1.6 Second paragraph — The proposal meets the underlying density for the Rural -5 zone. If the applicant provides support for fire, hospital and school services as a part of a development agreement, impacts to rural levels of services will be mitigated for consistency with this GPO; (GPO 8.33) 1 know the record is large on this proposal, but I urge careful consideration on this document. 1 have found many statements that are difficult to clearly associate with the intent of the proposal. The number if attachments and exhibits tend to be confusing and make it difficult to see all of the details as one clear picture. I would ask for definitions to some of the new "labels" being applied to the proposal.