Laserfiche WebLink
boats, snowmobiles, motorcycles, side by sides, four wheelers, jet skis and others. While a travel trailer <br />or Motorhome can contain gasoline, diesel and propane, additional motorized recreational vehicles are <br />often fueled using portable gas containers which in a public setting would require proper storage in an <br />approved FLAMMABLE storage cabinet. Again there is no provision in law for fire safety inspections of <br />private property. I believe the storage units could be a public safety hazard without guaranteed <br />stringent oversight. <br />(h) Overnight and human habitation of recreational vehicle storage units are restricted by condition 41 <br />page 32 of Kittitas County Ordinance 2018-006 <br />(i) "Outside storage would be limited, seasonal and ***". I do not see any description which <br />demonstrates there is outside storage for the RV Complex. The application specifically states there will <br />be not outside storage. Would this statement be a request for additional uses not included in original <br />application? Item 4.4 General Provisions page 4 of the proposed Resolution for a Development <br />Agreement between Kittitas County and the applicant states "Ownership within SCRVR is limited to <br />interior storage spaces and does not allow for exterior storage. <br />(j) "Storage unit use would be limited to free and simple ownership, tenants and guest" Conditi-on 40 <br />of Kittitas County Ordinance 2018-006 states "The recreational vehicle storage units shall be for the <br />exclusive use of recreational vehicle storage unit owners and shall not be rented to. Or used by, any <br />other person for any amount of time. Tenants and guests would not be allowed to use the recreational <br />vehicle storage units therefore the language in this document must be corrected to be in compliance <br />with the ordinance. Keep in mind that allowed uses in a PUD other than residential are restricted to <br />parcel owners within the PUD and are not to serve the public. Allowing public use of PUD amenities <br />would be a violation of code and would require revocation of the Conditional Use Permit. This statement <br />also applies to Exhibit F- Conditions Page 2 item 40) in which the applicant indicates CC&R's will provide <br />restrictions limiting use to ownership and inferring such a restriction would appear to be a violation and <br />restriction on private property rights. CC&R'S offer little assurance of continued compliance and can be <br />changed easily especially if the majority parcel owner is the developer. As far as violating private <br />property rights, I believe a Conditional Use Permit is a use that is conditioned upon existing code and in <br />this case a Development Agreement. If the applicant believes this condition violates private property <br />rights perhaps the application should be withdrawn until such time Washington State laws and Kittitas <br />County Code are in agreement with the applicants beliefs. <br />Note: Finding of fact 37.,1. C G 3e ; .F' iciiiltas County Ordinance 2018-006 mid pa.rapreph — "the <br />campground and recreai Ic fli, ve i &.[e storage areas are for the use of property owners only, and not <br />to be sold, rented, leased or otherwise used by nonresident pubiic. I believe this statement indicates <br />the intention of County Commissioners is to restrict ownership and use of the RV Complex and <br />campground to PUD residents. Documents presented by the applicant are vague on this subject and <br />must be presented with a clear statement regarding ownership and use of the RV Complex and <br />campground which is clear and in compliance with the ordinance. Such language which reflects use as <br />stated in the above referenced finding of face must be included in any document moving forward. <br />Section 2 <br />6. RV Complex <br />4 <br />