Laserfiche WebLink
If the submittal is incomplete, the County Engineer or designee shall identify in writing the specific <br />requirements, information, or materials necessary to complete the transportation impact analysis. <br />12.04.02.080 Concurrency Determination. <br />Development permits will not be approved unless there are adequate transportation facilities to meet the <br />level of service standards for existing and approved uses, based on the concurrency analysis in the TIA <br />which is based on the daily traffic volumes associated with the project and the capacity of the committed <br />transportation system. Concurrency requires adequate transportation facilities to be in place at the time of <br />development, or that a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies <br />needed for adequate transportation facilities within six years. <br />A. The County's review of all applications for development permits shall include a concurrency <br />evaluation. <br />B. The concurrency evaluation and determination shall be completed prior to: <br />1. Issuance of administrative approval/denial of the project permit if SEPA review is not a <br />requirement of the project; or <br />2. Issuance of the DNS, MDNS or DS if SEPA review is a requirement of the project; or <br />3. Issuance of the staff report to the hearings examiner if there is a hearing before the <br />hearings examiner and SEPA review is not a requirement of the project. <br />C. Development permits for phased developments shall have the concurrency evaluation <br />completed for the entire project. An applicant may elect to have the concurrency evaluation <br />undertaken for less than the entire project if and only if: <br />1. The County Engineer or designee agrees to such limited evaluation; and <br />2. Each phase shall include all of the infrastructure to service that phase;. and <br />3. There is a written note included in the preliminary approval for such phased development <br />that the traffic concurrency is limited only to the specific phases for which approval has <br />been provided. <br />D. If the concurrency evaluation meets the adopted roadway level of service standard for each <br />impacted arterial roadway (including state highways), the County Engineer or designee shall <br />issue a finding of concurrency, according to the provisions of KCC 12.04.02.090. This finding of <br />concurrency shall be based on the specific land uses or trip generation identified in the TIA and <br />is required for developments that are expected to generate more than forty (40) daily vehicle <br />trips. If the concurrency evaluation shows that the project results in exceeding the adopted <br />roadway level of service standard for any impacted arterial (including state highways), the <br />Title 12 Kittitas County Code I Draft No. 5 — Working Draft for Adoption 6/12/2018 <br />34 <br />