Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Health Appeal Minutes <br />December 15, 2016 <br />5 of 6 <br />Mr. Carmody discussed cost recovery language. Commissioner Jewell noted that Kittitas County Code <br />13.75.060 that deals with abatement. There was discussion amongst the group about the recovery <br />language in the ordinance. It was discussed about the processes and procedures for health orders, appeal, <br />and in that language it is noted that a final order process takes place 20 days after board makes decision, <br />enforcement options, and abatement. <br />Mr. Caulkins stepped to the microphone and again discussed the roles and responsibilities required with <br />amended health order. The remaining 20 camp sites to be corrected by April 30, 2017 or the county will <br />go in and fix the issues. Mr. Caulkins is ok with having an order from the board and not having a health <br />order, but is not saying the subject they were appealing about is correct. The board may be able to provide <br />some clarity to MRTCA. Continued discussion about who is responsible; the association or individuals. <br />The notices of the health order and sent out. The only one who appealed the health order was MRTCA. <br />Paul Jewell asked if the Health Order was directed at MRTCA. Mr. Caulkins stated that the campground <br />is one parcel so it was addressed and treated as such. Mr. Caulkins stated that the county was not aware of <br />grey water being dumped on the ground until the inspections occurred late this summer. The various <br />permits that we have for the septic systems talk about a septic system for a lodge or a bathroom, but it <br />does not specify that it is for 470 some lots. Mountain River Trails, as far as the county is concerned, <br />was a dry campground. Mr. Caulkins lastly noted that the assessment piece depends on language, but <br />does think it is justifiable under code. The group then discussed the definition of abatement and violation <br />processes and procedures with other programs. Holly Myers clarified that most of the programs have re- <br />inspection fees and if there is no re -inspection fee, there is an hourly rate. Commissioner Jewell discussed <br />the assessment piece and at this time there is no MRTCA final order. Mr. Caulkins again let the <br />commissioners know the processes that have led up to this point. Commissioner Jewell stated that the cost <br />associated with abatement is the cost of county going in and taking care of the issue, not cost of noticing <br />and inspection costs. If MRTCA does not comply by order date, then the county can abate. Mr. Carmody <br />stated they do not need an affirmance and noted that an order could be prepared that incorporates the <br />requirements of the amended orders. Laura Osiadacz asked why there was a timeline in the Health Order. <br />Holly Myers responded that there is a timeline to give MRTCA adequate time to report on actual use for <br />full septic volume. The appellant is not asking for affirmation of appeal. <br />At this time the board discussed the processes and procedures for an appeal hearing. <br />Motion 12-01: Motion to continue the hearing for board deliberation and possible board decision <br />until January 12, 2017 at 10:00 am in the Commissioners Auditorium. Commissioner Jewell <br />motioned to continue the hearing for board deliberation and possible board decision until January <br />12, 2017 at 10:00am in the Commissioners Auditorium. Laura Osiadacz second. All approved. <br />Motion 12-01 carried to continue the hearing for board deliberation and possible board decision <br />until January 12, 2017 at 10:00am in the Commissioners Auditorium. <br />Meeting done at 9:56 am <br />2 <br />(NugJcAeli, CBoard of Health <br />Rob n Read, Administrator, <br />